Search for: "United States v. General Dynamics"
Results 61 - 80
of 1,006
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Aug 2023, 9:12 pm
General Dynamics It is not surprising that the New Guidelines cite General Dynamics seven times; after all, the case has been cited in hundreds of opinions and even more law review articles and treatises. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 7:46 pm
The key issue was whether the DOJ had done enough to show one or more of these geographic markets: the entire United States; the three-state area of Wisconsin, Illinois, and Michigan; or just Wisconsin. [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 12:28 pm
Second, immigrants and their descendants have been essential in reducing the scope of affirmative action in the United States over the last 30 years…. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
These U.S. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
Federal and state rules already require reporting of most Scope 1 emissions, including the pollution from power plants that are others’ Scope 2 emissions. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 12:39 pm
United States (1962) as conclusory evidence. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 2:02 am
In one recent case, EEOC v. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 2:02 am
In one recent case, EEOC v. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 1:48 am
The artist Shahzia Sikander was one of the keynote speakers at the 2023 Annual Symposium: Transforming Public Art held by the Madison Square Park Conservancy a few days later on June 2nd.[2] During the symposium, Sikander explained how she drew inspiration from influential figures in the legal system, such as United States Supreme Court Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, as part of her exploration of the power dynamics and complexities of representation in public… [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 11:48 am
Known as Deferred Prosecution Agreements in the United States, the United Kingdom, and other jurisdictions, remediation agreements in Canada are prosecutorial tools available for combatting economic crimes. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
Sixty years ago, the Supreme Court handed down its decision in United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 4:41 pm
There's an FTC v. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 7:09 pm
Part V concludes with a report card on how the regime is doing on its thirtieth anniversary. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
The book points out that neither the Federalist nor other early commentaries used the word “interposition” and that the term did not even surface in state protests against Chisholm v. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
All the while, of course, the national citizenry has basically remained asleep, acceding to Madison’s devout wish, in Federalist 40, that they “venerate” the United States Constitution and, in effect, never even think of having a second national convention. [read post]
4 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
The constitutional protection the state receives in Chapter 9 bankruptcy regarding its sovereignty to organize its internal political units effectively subsidizes its decisions to favor suburban jurisdictions at the expense of central cities or any local government unit whose fiscal position is undermined by the state allowing competing subdivisions to form on its periphery. [read post]
30 May 2023, 1:10 pm
United States. [read post]
26 May 2023, 12:42 pm
Abbott v. [read post]
24 May 2023, 3:55 pm
Rather, the calculation of damages necessarily requires speculation regarding what price the parties would have negotiated if the data had been disclosed.[20] The Government has the burden to show “by some reasonable method” the amount it believes the final contract price was overstated.[21] There is a rebuttable presumption that the “natural and probable consequence” of defective cost or pricing data is a “dollar for dollar” increase in the contract price.[22]… [read post]
17 May 2023, 9:01 pm
United States v. [read post]
