Search for: "United States v. General Electric Co" Results 81 - 100 of 588
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Aug 2011, 12:58 pm by Trevor Cutaiar
  The United States Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals recently dealt with some of these new considerations in One Beacon Insurance Co. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 7:17 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Transportation Systems Divisionof General Electric Co., 417 F.3d 1203, 1209-10 (Fed. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 6:57 am by WIMS
Rather, we are led to our conclusion principally by an expansive gloss on the preemptive scope of the AEA first set forth in Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 8:50 am by WIMS
<> Twelve states produced 80% of U.S. wind power in 2013 - In 2013, 12 states accounted for 80% of U.S. wind-generated electricity, according to preliminary generation data released in EIA's March Electric Power Monthly report -- TX, IA, CA, OK, IL, KS, MN, OR, CO, WA, ND, WY. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 9:27 pm by Sean Wajert
M/V Ya Mawlaya, 99 F.3d 717, 722 (5th Cir. 1996); United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2016, 11:52 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Morgan, the following text is curious:By 1897, General Electric was the undisputed leader, and Westinghouse was its only serious rival. n152 The two companies agreed to a truce in the form of patent cross-licensing and product pricing agreements. n153 Smaller competitors were invited to join [*1931] the Incandescent Lamp Manufacturers Association, organized by General Electric. [read post]
On a recent episode of the Stanford Law School podcast, Stanford Legal, co-host Pam Karlan discussed the national abortion rights landscape after Dobbs v. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 5:30 pm by Aimee Brown
The second case this week is United Power, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 1:10 pm
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993); General Electric Co. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
Title VII was already on the books, but, when first asked in General Electric Co. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 7:05 am by Sheppard Mullin
General Electric Co., 21 B.R.B.S. 56, 58 (1988) (denying DBA benefits to the widow of a man who died due to autoerotic asphyxiation since no “relationship existed between the conditions created by the employer’s job and the activity which occasioned his death. [read post]