Search for: "United States v. General Motors Corporation" Results 1 - 20 of 356
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jan 2010, 3:45 pm by Lyle Denniston
If anything, the decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
26 May 2017, 3:21 pm by Floyd Abrams
As for nonmedia corporations, if the Times’s position were correct, as Brooklyn Law School professor Joel Gora has observed, its corporate owners could “endorse a presidential candidate on page twenty-six” while “the corporate owners of General Motors” could be held criminally liable for publishing an ad with the identical message on page twenty-five. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 3:01 pm
The syllabus is constructed with these general ideas in mind. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 1:44 pm by Natalie Kirby
Winchester (NY 1852): Establishing a General Duty for Manufacturers So, while there is no uniform product liability law in the United States, product liability laws across the USA are by and large similar, with experts largely agreeing that the foundational case for product liability law is Thomas v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 1:14 am by John Day
General Motors Acceptance Corp., 298 U. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 8:38 pm
Identify the legal framework within which the regulation of corporate social responsibility is framed within the United States, within international organizations, and among corporate actors.2. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 2:40 pm
The search for meaning about the scope and nature of this corporate responsibility remains contested in the United States.14 But the United States discussion has moved well beyond the original ideals of using corporate funds to provide charity to affected communities,15 though still discussed in terms of value maximization to the enterprise.16 Within these ext [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 5:37 pm
Identify the legal framework within which the regulation of corporate social responsibility is framed within the United States, within international organizations, and among corporate actors.2. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 7:01 am
Regal-Beloit Corporation Issue: Whether the Carmack Amendment to the Interstate Commerce Act of 1887, which governs certain rail and motor transportation by common carriers within the United States, 49 U.S.C. [read post]
15 May 2018, 11:25 am by Ronald Collins
One of those dots is Chief Justice John Marshall’s 1809 opinion in Bank of the United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 9:00 pm by Andrew Hamm
State courts’ general jurisdiction over out-of-state businesses In Cooper Tire & Rubber Company v. [read post]
13 Sep 2021, 9:00 am by Seeger Weiss
The case is pending in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. [read post]