Search for: "United States v. General Motors Corporation" Results 161 - 180 of 326
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Dec 2012, 9:30 pm by RegBlog
Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Sackett v. [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 2:35 pm by Mark Zamora
App. 558, 559-60 (1986); United Motor Freight Terminal Company Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 10:22 pm by Leland E. Beck
  At the end of judicial review, the United States Court of Appeals decided three sets of petitions for review of EPA rules, denying all of the petitions. [read post]
Littler Mendelson’s Executive Employer Survey Report, published in June 2012, asked nearly 1,000 C-suite executives, corporate counsel, and human resources professionals from corporations throughout the United States and ranging in market capitalization from less than $1 billion to more than $4 billion the following question: “Has your organization requested social media logins as part of the hiring or onboarding process? [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 12:52 pm by Gene Quinn
On Friday, July 6, 2012, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a decision in General Electric Co. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 6:14 am
v=eTnHjYOFuB4"} ) CITIZENS UNITED WON'T GET SECOND LOOK Arizona's law wasn't all the high court tackled. [read post]
8 May 2012, 5:15 pm
June 1, 2011) Single asset real estate (“SARE”) Chapter 11 cases have been recognized by the United States bankruptcy laws in one way or another since 1938, when Congress, in enacting the Chandler Act, included a separate chapter for real estate reorganizations by non-corporate debtors – old Chapter XII of the Bankruptcy Act of 1898. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 4:20 am by Lawrence Higgins
Archer, Dennis Archer PLLC, and David Leitch, VP and General Counsel of Ford Motor Company. [read post]
25 Feb 2012, 6:31 am
With the passage of time the number of sick industrial units increased rapidly. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 5:05 pm by support
Honda Motor Corporation’s recall of defective air bags is the subject. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:30 am by INFORRM
It’s because he or she thinks they can get away with it.“ The BBC has responded to an article in the Daily Mail which claimed that the BBC spent £4m laying off staff, but half the employees continued working as normal. “This article is inaccurate and misrepresents the facts” the corporation stated, as reported by Tabloid Watch here. [read post]