Search for: "United States v. General Petroleum Corporation" Results 181 - 200 of 258
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Dec 2011, 6:53 am by Bexis
  Yup, the United States Supreme Court decided two cases on our top ten list on the same day. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 4:07 am by Victoria VanBuren
  He has resolved disputes and crafted deals for more than two decades as a business and commercial litigator, general counsel, and president of a technology corporation. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 2:15 pm by Trey Childress
As previously reported here,  the United States Supreme Court recently granted certiorari in the case of Kiobel v. [read post]
’[3] On the question of domestic law the Court finds that ‘the law of the United States has been uniform since its founding that corporations can be held liable for the torts committed by their agents. [read post]
The article dissects the legal reasoning of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Kiobel v Royal Dutch Petroleum[1] and argues that the majority simply got it wrong principally by conflating ‘the jurisdictional and cause of action aspects of an ATS suit’. [read post]
The views expressed in these posts are those of the authors, and not of the Attorney-General's department or the Australian Government] The decision of the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in Kiobel v Royal Dutch Petroleum is remarkable for a number a reasons. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 5:00 pm by Amy Howe
  The first was Freeman v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 6:54 am by Marissa Miller
Royal Dutch Petroleum and Mohamad v. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 2:28 pm by Trey Childress
New Alien Tort Statute Case At The United States Supreme Court: Kiobel, et al., v Royal Dutch Petroleum Petition Filed In Kiobel, et al., v Royal Dutch Petroleum, et al.,... [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 7:41 am by Joshua Matz
  On this blog, Orin Kerr previewed the search-related issue presented in United States v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 6:35 am by Kali Borkoski
Goodyear, Citizens United, Walmart v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 6:18 pm by John Elwood
United States, 10-9746 (ditto); and Wesevich v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 9:15 am by Trey Childress
Related posts:New Alien Tort Statute Case At The United States Supreme Court: Kiobel, et al., v Royal Dutch Petroleum Petition Filed In Kiobel, et al., v Royal Dutch Petroleum, et al.,... [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 7:45 am by Kali Borkoski
Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner’s reply United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 7:45 am by John Elwood
United States (relisted after the 9/26 and 10/7 Conferences) Docket:  10-9333 Issue(s):  Whether the U.S. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 3:18 pm by Kiera Flynn
United States (relisted after the 9/26 Conference) Docket:  10-9333 Issue(s):  Whether the U.S. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 4:53 pm by John Elwood
   United States v. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 6:13 am by Christa Culver
Royal Dutch Petroleum et al.Docket: 10-1491Issue(s): (1) Whether the issue of corporate civil tort liability under the Alien Tort Statute (“ATS”), 28 U.S.C. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 8:39 am by A.J.B.
Reyno, a wrongful death action was brought in United States federal courts on behalf of the Scottish victims of an air crash against the American manufacturer in United States federal court.[14]   In the Piper decision, the Court seems to have attempted to moderate its approach to forum non conveniens with an acknowledgement that there is nothing in the ruling which compels courts to ignore the possibility of an unfavorable change in law. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 8:39 am by A.J.B.
Reyno, a wrongful death action was brought in United States federal courts on behalf of the Scottish victims of an air crash against the American manufacturer in United States federal court.[14]   In the Piper decision, the Court seems to have attempted to moderate its approach to forum non conveniens with an acknowledgement that there is nothing in the ruling which compels courts to ignore the possibility of an unfavorable change in law. [read post]