Search for: "United States v. General Petroleum Corporation"
Results 21 - 40
of 258
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Dec 2011, 4:00 am
’[3] On the question of domestic law the Court finds that ‘the law of the United States has been uniform since its founding that corporations can be held liable for the torts committed by their agents. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 8:48 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum, the court held that aliens cannot bring suit in a United States court for conduct that occurred entirely, or primarily, in another country, unless the domestic conduct is sufficient to displace the strong presumption against extraterritoriality. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 5:10 am
See Kiobel, et al. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2010, 9:49 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum (issued today by a 2nd Circuit panel of Judge Cabranes writing for himself and Judge Wood, and a concurrence in the judgment by Judge Leval). [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 9:01 pm
Solicitor General Don Verrilli, Jr. argued on behalf of the United States and capably defended the government’s nuanced approach to interpreting the ATS. [read post]
25 Jan 2009, 7:38 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 9:01 pm
The most interesting supplemental brief was filed by the United States. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 7:19 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 6:35 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum, in which the issue is whether corporations can be sued for serious human rights abuses under the Alien Tort Statute (ATS), 28 USC 1350. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 4:12 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co. [read post]
23 Jul 2007, 6:36 am
Getty Petroleum Marketing, Inc., certain New Jersey and Pennsylvania franchisee operators are betting on the latter and have filed suit in the United States District Court in the District of New Jersey against Getty and Lukoil Americas Corporation (“Lukoil”). [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 10:04 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum symposium is written by Sarah H. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 11:06 am
Previously, and relying on the Court’s opinion in Phillips Petroleum Co. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 8:25 am
Professor Seck has recently been considering ramifications of Kiobel v Royal Dutch Petroleum 569 U. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 5:12 am
The Solicitor General has filed an amicus brief arguing that the ATS does allow for corporate liability but suggesting that, on remand, the suit should nevertheless be dismissed because the plaintiffs’ claims do not sufficiently touch and concern the United States. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 5:41 am
Cuomo, 66 NY2d 185, 190-191 [1985], citing United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 6:55 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., the decision in Kurns v. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 8:20 pm
(Kenneth Anderson) I’ve now had a chance to read a little more closely the decision, majority and concurrence, in Kiobel v. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 6:33 am
The Shell Petroleum Development Company of Nigeria ("SPDC") is a Nigerian corporation with its headquarters in Nigeria. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 10:55 am
The lifecycle of the ATS tracks almost exactly the lifecycle of the human rights movement in the United States. [read post]
