Search for: "United States v. General Petroleum Corporation"
Results 41 - 60
of 256
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2020, 9:01 pm
Lucas and Giorgianni v. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 3:00 am
His high-profile cases include the “trial of the century,” otherwise known as United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 12:12 pm
State Attorney Generals Increase Scrutiny of Restrictive Covenants A group of 18 attorneys general filed comments with the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) in July 2019 in advance of a series of hearings centered on changes to antitrust and consumer protection enforcement in the 21st century. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 8:29 pm
She cited some cases about corporate responsibility in war crimes, such as Khulumani (United States), Sanader (Croatia), Kiobel v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 12:26 pm
Compare generally, Bandera Master Funds LP v. [read post]
1 May 2019, 7:51 am
One of the four widows, Esther Kiobel had brought a suit against Shell in the United States. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 7:54 pm
., Ltd. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 6:43 am
” In fact, the three major joint oil ventures in the country, between Nile Petroleum Company, the state-owned oil company, and Chinese National Petroleum Company, Petronas of Malaysia, and the Indian Oil and Natural Gas Corporation, have already been designated by the U.S. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 6:43 am
” In fact, the three major joint oil ventures in the country, between Nile Petroleum Company, the state-owned oil company, and Chinese National Petroleum Company, Petronas of Malaysia, and the Indian Oil and Natural Gas Corporation, have already been designated by the U.S. [read post]
January 2, 1882 – John D. Rockefeller Forms Standard Oil Trust, First Sanctioned Monopoly in America
2 Jan 2019, 12:01 am
United States, 221 U.S. 1 (1911) the Supreme Court of the United States found Standard Oil guilty of entering into contracts in restraint of trade and monopolizing the petroleum industry through a long convoluted series of anticompetitive actions. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 1:00 pm
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co. applied the presumption of extraterritoriality to the ATS and concluded that courts had jurisdiction only over ATS claims that “touch and concern” the territory of the United States with “sufficient force. [read post]
23 Nov 2018, 5:31 am
Moreover, there is already an indication of potential conflict in recent cases filed in the United States in which these issues have been raised (Licea v. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 12:53 pm
Homer City Generation v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 2:04 pm
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 2:04 pm
The Court ruled, instead, that “all the relevant conduct took place outside the United States. [read post]
7 May 2018, 4:00 am
Yet surely the United States should take a stand against corporate involvement in human rights violations by sanctioning firms that profit through abuse. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 2:29 pm
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., 569 U. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 8:48 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum, the court held that aliens cannot bring suit in a United States court for conduct that occurred entirely, or primarily, in another country, unless the domestic conduct is sufficient to displace the strong presumption against extraterritoriality. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 11:01 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum—which excluded corporate liability under the ATS—that the ATS was “not dead yet. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 10:55 am
The lifecycle of the ATS tracks almost exactly the lifecycle of the human rights movement in the United States. [read post]
