Search for: "United States v. General Petroleum Corporation" Results 41 - 60 of 259
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Mar 2019, 6:43 am by Evan Schleicher
” In fact, the three major joint oil ventures in the country, between Nile Petroleum Company, the state-owned oil company, and Chinese National Petroleum Company, Petronas of Malaysia, and the Indian Oil and Natural Gas Corporation, have already been designated by the U.S. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 6:43 am by Evan Schleicher
” In fact, the three major joint oil ventures in the country, between Nile Petroleum Company, the state-owned oil company, and Chinese National Petroleum Company, Petronas of Malaysia, and the Indian Oil and Natural Gas Corporation, have already been designated by the U.S. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 12:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
United States, 221 U.S. 1 (1911) the Supreme Court of the United States found Standard Oil guilty of entering into contracts in restraint of trade and monopolizing the petroleum industry through a long convoluted series of anticompetitive actions. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 12:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
United States, 221 U.S. 1 (1911) the Supreme Court of the United States found Standard Oil guilty of entering into contracts in restraint of trade and monopolizing the petroleum industry through a long convoluted series of anticompetitive actions. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 1:00 pm by Zach ZhenHe Tan
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co. applied the presumption of extraterritoriality to the ATS and concluded that courts had jurisdiction only over ATS claims that “touch and concern” the territory of the United States with “sufficient force. [read post]
23 Nov 2018, 5:31 am
  Moreover, there is already an indication of potential conflict in recent cases filed in the United States in which these issues have been raised (Licea v. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 2:04 pm
The Court ruled, instead, that “all the relevant conduct took place outside the United States. [read post]
7 May 2018, 4:00 am by Pierre-Hugues Verdier, Paul Stephan
Yet surely the United States should take a stand against corporate involvement in human rights violations by sanctioning firms that profit through abuse. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 8:48 am by Chinmayi Sharma
Royal Dutch Petroleum, the court held that aliens cannot bring suit in a United States court for conduct that occurred entirely, or primarily, in another country, unless the domestic conduct is sufficient to displace the strong presumption against extraterritoriality. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 11:01 am by Chimène Keitner
Royal Dutch Petroleum—which excluded corporate liability under the ATS—that the ATS was “not dead yet. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 10:55 am by Samuel Moyn
The lifecycle of the ATS tracks almost exactly the lifecycle of the human rights movement in the United States. [read post]
  The objectives are common, not disparate; the general corporate actions are guided or determined not by two separate corporate consciousnesses, but one. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 12:37 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  The objectives are common, not disparate; the general corporate actions are guided or determined not by two separate corporate consciousnesses, but one. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 4:30 am by Robert Loeb, Sarah Grant
 The majority opinion, after 14 pages of opining how the ATS does not apply to human rights violations occurring outside the United States, added: “[o]n these facts, all the relevant conduct took place outside the United States. [read post]
It rejected the Council’s claim that the County improperly piecemealed the CEQA analyses for each amendment, because, as stated in Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 5:08 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  As of December 29, 2017, the Senate has confirmed including 19 Trump administration judicial nominees, including one Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, 12 judges for the United States Courts of Appeals, and six judges for the United States District Courts. [read post]