Search for: "United States v. General Petroleum Corporation" Results 41 - 60 of 256
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Aug 2020, 6:59 am by Kristian Soltes
Department of Justice and a contingent of state attorneys general challenged AmEx’s anti-steering rules in a case that reached the Supreme Court in 2018 as Ohio v. [read post]
2 Aug 2020, 4:58 am by Schachtman
Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation.[5] The plaintiff had characterized the case as a consumer case, with the duty to warn him as the ultimate user. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 3:00 am by Joshua Holt
His high-profile cases include the “trial of the century,” otherwise known as United States v. [read post]
State Attorney Generals Increase Scrutiny of Restrictive Covenants A group of 18 attorneys general filed comments with the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) in July 2019 in advance of a series of hearings centered on changes to antitrust and consumer protection enforcement in the 21st century. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 8:29 pm by Valerie Oosterveld
She cited some cases about corporate responsibility in war crimes, such as Khulumani (United States), Sanader (Croatia), Kiobel v. [read post]
1 May 2019, 7:51 am
  One of the four widows, Esther Kiobel had brought a suit against Shell in the United States. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 6:43 am by Evan Schleicher
” In fact, the three major joint oil ventures in the country, between Nile Petroleum Company, the state-owned oil company, and Chinese National Petroleum Company, Petronas of Malaysia, and the Indian Oil and Natural Gas Corporation, have already been designated by the U.S. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 6:43 am by Evan Schleicher
” In fact, the three major joint oil ventures in the country, between Nile Petroleum Company, the state-owned oil company, and Chinese National Petroleum Company, Petronas of Malaysia, and the Indian Oil and Natural Gas Corporation, have already been designated by the U.S. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 12:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
United States, 221 U.S. 1 (1911) the Supreme Court of the United States found Standard Oil guilty of entering into contracts in restraint of trade and monopolizing the petroleum industry through a long convoluted series of anticompetitive actions. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 1:00 pm by Zach ZhenHe Tan
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co. applied the presumption of extraterritoriality to the ATS and concluded that courts had jurisdiction only over ATS claims that “touch and concern” the territory of the United States with “sufficient force. [read post]
23 Nov 2018, 5:31 am
  Moreover, there is already an indication of potential conflict in recent cases filed in the United States in which these issues have been raised (Licea v. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 2:04 pm
The Court ruled, instead, that “all the relevant conduct took place outside the United States. [read post]
7 May 2018, 4:00 am by Pierre-Hugues Verdier, Paul Stephan
Yet surely the United States should take a stand against corporate involvement in human rights violations by sanctioning firms that profit through abuse. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 8:48 am by Chinmayi Sharma
Royal Dutch Petroleum, the court held that aliens cannot bring suit in a United States court for conduct that occurred entirely, or primarily, in another country, unless the domestic conduct is sufficient to displace the strong presumption against extraterritoriality. [read post]