Search for: "United States v. General Petroleum Corporation"
Results 121 - 140
of 257
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2023, 8:57 pm
Royal Dutch Petroleum (2013), Jesner v. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 2:33 pm
” The Ukrainian Ambassador to the United States is here tonight. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 10:01 pm
Asiatic Petroleum Co. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 9:35 am
The European Union and the United States voted against the resolution, which they thought counter-productive and polarizing; both stated that they would not participate in the treaty negotiating process.[5] Japan and South Korea also voted no. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 11:50 am
The COA did, in fact, foreclose on the unit. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 2:04 pm
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. [read post]
January 2, 1882 – John D. Rockefeller Forms Standard Oil Trust, First Sanctioned Monopoly in America
2 Jan 2019, 12:01 am
United States, 221 U.S. 1 (1911) the Supreme Court of the United States found Standard Oil guilty of entering into contracts in restraint of trade and monopolizing the petroleum industry through a long convoluted series of anticompetitive actions. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 1:10 pm
Lopez (1995), United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 1:00 am
On Tuesday 15 December, the Supreme Court will hear the case of General Dynamics United Kingdom Ltd v State of Libya. [read post]
23 Nov 2018, 5:31 am
Moreover, there is already an indication of potential conflict in recent cases filed in the United States in which these issues have been raised (Licea v. [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 4:41 am
This morning, January 16th, the United States Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in the case of Mead Corp. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 4:53 pm
United States v. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 6:58 pm
Occidental, and Sarei v. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 6:58 pm
Occidental, and Sarei v. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am
In FDIC v. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 6:24 pm
Royal Dutch Petroleum (2013) that if a plaintiff wants to hold a defendant liable for human rights violations that occurred in another country under the ATS, the plaintiff must show that the claim “touches and concerns” the United States. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 9:33 am
A state law that capped damages at $5 million for the entire incident, upped to $6 million by the General Assembly. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 9:33 am
A state law that capped damages at $5 million for the entire incident, upped to $6 million by the General Assembly. [read post]
14 May 2013, 7:19 am
United States, a challenge to the constitutionality of court-martial jurisdiction over a civilian contractor. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 2:22 pm
Royal Dutch Petroleum and Mohamad v. [read post]
