Search for: "United States v. General Petroleum Corporation"
Results 141 - 160
of 257
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2012, 9:49 am
As the first brief of the United States in Kiobel emphasized, “international law . . . establishes the substantive standards of conduct and generally leaves the means of enforcing those substantive standards to each state. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 10:12 am
Alvarez-Machain, which involved the extraterritorial actions of a non-citizen agent of the U.S. government – again, that is well within the purposes of the ATS and entirely distinct from corporations with only tenuous connections to the United States. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 8:37 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum comes from Oona A. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 10:04 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum symposium is written by Sarah H. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 12:11 pm
Although many of the briefs filed in the Kiobel litigation take the “binary approach,” the briefs of the United States did not. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 8:58 am
The following contribution to our Kiobel v. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 1:55 pm
And a nearly contemporaneous 1795 opinion of Attorney General William Bradford states that the statute would apply to a claim arising in the territory of Sierra Leone, a sovereign state. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 8:15 am
For example, in United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 1:41 am
BALLON - #141819 [email] HEATHER MEEKER - #172148 [email] GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP [email] [address] [phone] [fax] Attorneys for Defendant GOOGLE INC. ________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ORACLE AMERICA, INC., Plaintiff, v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 6:40 am
United States (relisted [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 12:40 pm
Royal Dutch Petroleum are facing today. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 7:05 pm
Royal Dutch Petroleum (docket 10-1491). [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 11:19 am
(Celanese Corporation v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 8:41 am
Unlike Kiobel, there is no real dispute that the Torture Victim Protection Act (TVPA), the law on which the plaintiffs in Mohamad were seeking to rely, applies to conduct that occurred outside the United States. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 11:57 am
Courts to adjudicate human rights disputes that have nothing to do with the United States. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:42 pm
” (United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 8:58 am
TITLE V–GEOSPATIAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT Sec. 501. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 10:00 pm
There’s no connection to the United States whatsoever. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 5:00 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum, 10-1491, we figured we owe our readers an update about a significant status change.As we mentioned before, the Court accepted the appeal in Kiobel to answer a rather general question that nonetheless could affect drug/device companies caught up in Alien Tort litigation – whether the Act could be applied to corporations, as opposed to individuals.Well, that’s been changed. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 7:09 am
But in that case the only place they could sue was in the United States. [read post]
