Search for: "United States v. Generes"
Results 181 - 200
of 34,489
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2025, 6:30 am
Cir. 1954) (en banc) United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2025, 4:01 am
Edwards, the leading authority on the office of the Attorney General in the United Kingdom and in the broader Commonwealth, was quite clear in his classic 1964 work The Law Officers of the Crown, and as recently as 1995 in a Canadian essay, that outside their prosecutorial decision-making, the Attorney General was and should be liable to professional discipline in the same way as any other lawyer.[10] Even Edwards, however, focused little on this professional… [read post]
27 Mar 2025, 12:15 am
Supreme Court's decision in Mallory v. [read post]
26 Mar 2025, 9:05 pm
United States. [read post]
26 Mar 2025, 9:01 pm
United States, 806 Fed. [read post]
26 Mar 2025, 2:34 pm
United States.) [read post]
26 Mar 2025, 1:03 pm
United States (DDC March 18, 2025) Judge Ana Reyes (D. [read post]
26 Mar 2025, 12:34 pm
Co. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2025, 11:47 am
United States 24-683Issue: Whether Feres v. [read post]
26 Mar 2025, 9:11 am
Pew v. [read post]
25 Mar 2025, 12:04 pm
United States, in which a majority of the court declined to revive the nondelegation doctrine. [read post]
25 Mar 2025, 12:04 pm
United States, in which a majority of the court declined to revive the nondelegation doctrine. [read post]
25 Mar 2025, 7:13 am
” That remarkable statement by the Attorney General of the United States Pam Bondi on March 15 was certainly designed to get the public’s attention. [read post]
25 Mar 2025, 6:35 am
Until the United States Senate confirms Mark Meador, the President’s nominee to fill a Republican vacancy on the Commission, or the Supreme Court overturns Humphrey’s Executor, which held that principal officers of independent agencies may be removed only for cause, any vote by the now-two-member Commission may be vulnerable to challenge. [read post]
25 Mar 2025, 6:00 am
The Board rationally found, under the second prong, that there was no "reasonable relationship between the subject matter of the dispute and the general subject matter of the CBA" (Matter of New York State Off. of Children & Family Servs. v Lanterman, 14 NY3d 275, 283 [2010][citation omitted]).We reject petitioner's argument that its members who failed to comply with the citywide vaccine mandate were deprived of rights under the regulations of respondent… [read post]
25 Mar 2025, 6:00 am
The Board rationally found, under the second prong, that there was no "reasonable relationship between the subject matter of the dispute and the general subject matter of the CBA" (Matter of New York State Off. of Children & Family Servs. v Lanterman, 14 NY3d 275, 283 [2010][citation omitted]).We reject petitioner's argument that its members who failed to comply with the citywide vaccine mandate were deprived of rights under the regulations of respondent… [read post]
25 Mar 2025, 5:00 am
See Wilcox v. [read post]
25 Mar 2025, 4:00 am
The complaint (full text) in Pregnancy Care Center of Rockford v. [read post]
25 Mar 2025, 4:00 am
First note that in Espinoza v. [read post]
24 Mar 2025, 7:16 pm
Further, significant deadlines for filings within condemnation actions are based upon the good faith offer, which then establishes additional deadlines and the timing of condemnation actions generally. [read post]
