Search for: "United States v. Generes"
Results 81 - 100
of 34,108
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2025, 1:48 am
” United StatesTikTok Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2025, 9:05 pm
The order stated that advanced aerial attacks are the “most catastrophic” threat to the United States. [read post]
30 Jan 2025, 9:01 pm
In one of the most interesting and potentially important cases on this Term’s Supreme Court docket, FCC v. [read post]
30 Jan 2025, 5:14 pm
Last week, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit vacated the Federal Communications Commission’s (“FCC”) 1:1 consent rule. [read post]
30 Jan 2025, 1:37 pm
Looking Forward Following his inauguration as the 47th President of the United States, Donald Trump again withdrew the U [read post]
30 Jan 2025, 7:02 am
Macy’s relied in part on United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2025, 5:01 am
" United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2025, 4:00 am
But see Erica Richler, “A Reasonable Sanction: Gibbon v. [read post]
30 Jan 2025, 1:36 am
[Theraplant LLC, v National Fire & Marine Insurance Company, United District Court, District of Connecticut 3:22-CV-0195 (VDO)] [read post]
29 Jan 2025, 6:54 pm
The decision, issued in MVL USA, Inc. et al. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2025, 12:26 pm
Doe” lives in Massachusetts and has temporary protected status in the United States. [read post]
29 Jan 2025, 11:36 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
29 Jan 2025, 8:21 am
By: Rachel V. [read post]
29 Jan 2025, 6:00 am
In support of its argument that NJT was an "arm of the state" entitled to invoke sovereign immunity, defendants cited a decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit holding that NJT is entitled to invoke sovereign immunity in federal court (see Karns v Shanahan, 879 F3d 504, 519 [3d Cir 2018]). [read post]
29 Jan 2025, 6:00 am
In support of its argument that NJT was an "arm of the state" entitled to invoke sovereign immunity, defendants cited a decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit holding that NJT is entitled to invoke sovereign immunity in federal court (see Karns v Shanahan, 879 F3d 504, 519 [3d Cir 2018]). [read post]
29 Jan 2025, 5:28 am
United States. [read post]
29 Jan 2025, 4:45 am
This was stated in the Youngstown Sheet and Tube Co. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2025, 5:33 pm
United States. [read post]
28 Jan 2025, 4:32 pm
Circuit described the ICA’s prohibition of impoundment as valid law and quoted a memorandum written by then-Assistant Attorney General William Rehnquist (as head of the Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel) stating that, with respect to presidential impoundment power, “existence of such a broad power is supported by neither reason nor precedent. [read post]
28 Jan 2025, 2:12 pm
United States opinion. [read post]