Search for: "United States v. Generes" Results 81 - 100 of 34,108
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2025, 9:05 pm by Macy Berryman
The order stated that advanced aerial attacks are the “most catastrophic” threat to the United States. [read post]
30 Jan 2025, 5:14 pm by David Klein
Last week, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit vacated the Federal Communications Commission’s (“FCC”) 1:1 consent rule. [read post]
30 Jan 2025, 1:37 pm by Tony Toranto and Nathan Barbara
Looking Forward Following his inauguration as the 47th President of the United States, Donald Trump again withdrew the U [read post]
30 Jan 2025, 1:36 am by Patrick Bracher (ZA)
[Theraplant LLC, v National Fire & Marine Insurance Company, United District Court, District of Connecticut 3:22-CV-0195 (VDO)] [read post]
29 Jan 2025, 12:26 pm by Just Security
Doe” lives in Massachusetts and has temporary protected status in the United States. [read post]
29 Jan 2025, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In support of its argument that NJT was an "arm of the state" entitled to invoke sovereign immunity, defendants cited a decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit holding that NJT is entitled to invoke sovereign immunity in federal court (see Karns v Shanahan, 879 F3d 504, 519 [3d Cir 2018]). [read post]
29 Jan 2025, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In support of its argument that NJT was an "arm of the state" entitled to invoke sovereign immunity, defendants cited a decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit holding that NJT is entitled to invoke sovereign immunity in federal court (see Karns v Shanahan, 879 F3d 504, 519 [3d Cir 2018]). [read post]
28 Jan 2025, 4:32 pm by Guest Author
Circuit described the ICA’s prohibition of impoundment as valid law and quoted a memorandum written by then-Assistant Attorney General William Rehnquist (as head of the Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel) stating that, with respect to presidential impoundment power, “existence of such a broad power is supported by neither reason nor precedent. [read post]