Search for: "United States v. Gibbons" Results 101 - 120 of 242
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jul 2016, 12:08 pm by Marisa N. Hourdajian
Employers should be aware that the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has held, in Graziadio v. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 8:13 am by Peter J. Dugan
United States Steel Corp., which clarified what it means for an employee to be “changing clothes” under Section 3(o) of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”). [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 11:18 pm by Jon
CJ Marshall also introduced the term "plenary" into Supreme Court jurisprudence in Gibbons v. [read post]
United States, 432 F.2d 1052 (3d Cir. 1970), and pointing out that, in determining whether all substantial rights to a patent were transferred, the Court must consider not only the terms of the contracts but also the intent of the parties. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 12:57 pm by Richard S. Zackin
Joseph’s Hospital, Inc., the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit joined the Eighth Circuit in concluding that there is no ADA violation if the employer requires the disabled employee to compete for the open position. [read post]
On June 16, 2020, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) published a final rule revising patent term adjustment under 35 U.S.C. 154(b) in view of Supernus Pharm., Inc. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 9:42 am by Richard S. Zackin
Recently, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, in Minarsky v. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 5:05 am by Scott Bomboy
In 1824, Supreme Court Chief Justice John Marshall’s opinion in Gibbons v. [read post]
Last December, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit found the Lanham Act’s disparagement provision unconstitutional, stating that while the rejected trademarks “convey hurtful speech that harms members of oft-stigmatized communities,” the First Amendment “protects even hurtful speech. [read post]