Search for: "United States v. Giles" Results 1 - 20 of 102
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2008, 10:43 pm
Giles takes away a basis for challenging Owens.One unfortunate aspect of modern Confrontation Clause doctrine is the rule of United States v. [read post]
22 Nov 2009, 9:07 pm
First, Smiley alleges that these Counts present no case or controversy as required by the Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C § 2201, and Article III, Section 2 of the United States Constitution. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 7:24 pm by Richard D. Friedman
A couple of people have pointed out to me the decision of the Sixth Circuit yesterday in United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 9:20 am by Gene Quinn
In 1998, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, in State Street Bank & Trust Co. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 3:11 pm
Earlier: Prior ATL coverage of Perkins Coie Sponsored Topics: Perkins Coie - Law - Bob Giles - United States - Business [read post]
9 Jan 2008, 1:33 pm
United States, No. 07-6395, seeking review of United States v. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 6:00 am by Cynthia Giles
By Cynthia Giles Back in 1986, I was an assistant U.S. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 5:03 pm
Did she make any use in commerce in the United States? [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 2:18 pm by Giles Peaker
Queensbridge Investments Limited v Lodge & Ors [2015] UKUT 635 (LC) There was quite a simple question at issue in this Upper Tribunal (Land Chamber) appeal – could the FTT appoint a manager to the whole of a building which contained a leased commercial unit as well as three leased residential units? [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 12:02 am by rhapsodyinbooks
And while Jefferson continued to insist, even when retired, that the federal and state governments represented two independent and equal sovereigns, Marshall, in McCulloch v. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 12:02 am by rhapsodyinbooks
And while Jefferson continued to insist, even when retired, that the federal and state governments represented two independent and equal sovereigns, Marshall, in McCulloch v. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 1:32 pm by Giles Peaker
If anything, the recent Supreme Court judgment on indirect discrimination by a provision, criterion or practice (PCP) in Essop and others (Appellants) v Home Office (UK Border Agency) (Respondent) Naeem (Appellant) v Secretary of State for Justice (Respondent) (2017) UKSC 27 might have made such a claim more straightforward to bring. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 1:44 pm by Giles Peaker
Best, R (On the Application Of) v The Secretary of State for Justice (Rev 1) [2015] EWCA Civ 17 The Court of Appeal considered the clash of s.144 LASPO and the rules on adverse possession, on appeal from the Administrative Court. [read post]