Search for: "United States v. Giles" Results 81 - 100 of 156
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jul 2018, 10:00 pm
In a decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) dated July 20, 2018, and including AOL, Apple, Google and Yahoo as defendants, Judge Plager issued a 17-page dissent calling the current state of the law on patent eligibility to be unworkable and in need of a fix. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 6:59 am
Giles of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and Judge Jane R. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 11:30 am
Nazi Conspiracy and Aggression 12 v. (1946-1948) Office of United States Chief of Counsel. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 9:42 pm by Richard D. Friedman
The United States Supreme Court has now reversed that decision, in an opinion by Justice Sotomayor. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 1:16 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal Practice Adelphia Defendants Denied New Trial; Claim That Chief Witness' Testimony Was Perjured Is Rejected United States v. [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 3:54 pm by Giles Peaker
In this situation the Code states that the Secretary of State considers it is unlikely to be reasonable for a tenant to occupy the property beyond the date in the s.21 notice (1 July 2014). [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
  By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
12 Jan 2013, 7:46 am by Jon Gelman
Environmental Protection Agency, Criminal Investigation Division, under the direction of Special Agent in Charge William V. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 8:42 am by Dave
Three decisions of the Administrative Appeals Chamber of the Upper Tribunal on HB matters stand out: SS v North East Lincolnshire Council (HB) [2011] UKUT 300 (AAC); MB v Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea (HB) [2011] UKUT 321 (AAC); MR v Bournemouth Borough Council (HB) [2011] UKUT 284 (AAC). [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 8:42 am by Dave
Three decisions of the Administrative Appeals Chamber of the Upper Tribunal on HB matters stand out: SS v North East Lincolnshire Council (HB) [2011] UKUT 300 (AAC); MB v Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea (HB) [2011] UKUT 321 (AAC); MR v Bournemouth Borough Council (HB) [2011] UKUT 284 (AAC). [read post]