Search for: "United States v. Gill"
Results 61 - 80
of 314
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2007, 5:47 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 9:40 am
United States with respect to its claims for relief from Sections 2 and 3 of the federal DOMA. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 4:21 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 11:49 am
United States, doesn’t have an appeals court decision yet. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 3:07 am
On Tuesday, October 3, the nine Justices will consider Gill v. [read post]
25 May 2017, 4:10 am
At Governing, Alan Greenblatt discusses how the “’efficiency gap,’” which “works by looking at how many votes for one party are wasted,” may provide “the missing piece for complainants” seeking to “statistically prove intent when it comes to partisan gerrymanders” like the one at issue in Gill v. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:11 am
” Also in an op-ed for The Hill, Ashley Baker urges the court to “be particularly cognizant of the potential for judicial overreach” in United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 4:10 am
The dust continues to settle from the court’s unanimous rulings on Monday in two partisan-gerrymandering cases, Gill v. [read post]
19 May 2009, 9:36 am
" THe United States Supreme Court in Oncale v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 4:00 am
In Gill v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 7:38 am
Ferrer, United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, John V. [read post]
19 Oct 2012, 9:25 am
OPM in February and continued with the First Circuit's ruling in Gill v. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 7:30 am
On October 3, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Gill v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 8:02 pm
House of Representatives in oppositionReply of petitioner Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the United States House of Representatives v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 9:59 pm
HHS and Gill v. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 4:07 am
” Additional coverage of the solicitor general’s motion in United States v. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 5:29 am
More recently, the Grand Chamber of the ECtHR in Zakharov v Russia stated that “the interception authorisation, … must clearly identify a specific person …or single set of premises”. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 2:10 pm
District Court in Boston under the name of Gill v. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 8:17 am
Schwarzenegger, the California same-sex marriage case, Gill v. [read post]
15 Jan 2018, 12:03 pm
While this paper draws largely upon common law sources from the United States and Canada, metaphor provides a core form of cognitive scaffolding across legal traditions. [read post]
