Search for: "United States v. Glaxo Group Limited" Results 1 - 11 of 11
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Oct 2009, 1:56 pm
PRESS RELEASE: GlaxoSmithKline (NYSE: GSK) today announced that it has reached agreement with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) to join the USPTO’s motion to dismiss its litigation over Final Regulations published in August 2007 (Triantafyllos Tafas and SmithKline Beecham Corporation, SmithKline Beecham PLC and Glaxo Group Limited vs. [read post]
19 Nov 2020, 3:18 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
GSK lost its appeal at the CAFC: Following trial, a jury in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware found that defendants GlaxoSmithKline LLC and Glaxo Group Limited (collectively, “GSK”) infringed U.S. [read post]
17 Oct 2006, 2:04 pm
That system was introduced to limit parallel trade in drugs between Spain, where the administration sets maximum prices, and other member States, in particular the United Kingdom, where prices are fixed at a higher level. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 9:00 am by John N. Davis
A different group of programmers would have done it a little or even a lot differently. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 7:02 am by Elizabeth McAuliffe (Bristows)
If the skilled person were in the United States, he would seek the assistance of a FAA DER who would be responsible for ensuring compliance with the relevant FAA regulations and guidelines. [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 11:18 am
" in the same paragraph in Westlaw produced 16 hits just in the United States Supreme Court - as recent as Watters v. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 10:19 am by John Steele
The United States Supreme Court held that a single violation of Brady obligations is not sufficient to create civil damages liabilities for a district attorney’s office under section 1983. [read post]