Search for: "United States v. Goldman" Results 261 - 280 of 478
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2012, 2:36 pm by Brian J. Brislen
  Rather,  “only those actions by the claimant which have the purpose and effect of causing the United States to pay out money it is not obligated to pay, or those actions which intentionally deprive the United States of money it is lawfully due, are properly considered ‘claims’ within the meaning of the FCA. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 6:48 am
Eric Goldman, director of the High Tech Law Center at Santa Clara University in the United States, questions that approach to regulating the Internet. [read post]
13 May 2017, 7:00 am by Eric Goldman
  The United States District Court for the District of Utah, however, denied Xcentric’s motion. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 4:05 am by Edith Roberts
” Additional commentary comes from LeRoy Goldman at his eponymous blog. [read post]
12 May 2010, 2:09 pm by pfriedman
Roberts became chief justice of the United States, he said that he hoped to emulate the modesty and unanimity of his greatest predecessor, John Marshall. [read post]
21 Apr 2012, 5:06 pm by INFORRM
Supreme Court The most significant US Supreme Court decision in this area since our last round-up is one that we trailed in January of this year, in United States v Jones (10-1259 01/23/2012). [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 11:34 am by Steve Gottlieb
— This commentary was scheduled for broadcast on WAMC Northeast Report on August 11, 2020. [1] https://www.npr.org/2020/06/27/884213464/dc-statue-of-lincoln-standing-over-a-formerly-enslaved-man-sparks-controversy [2] United States v Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542 (1875). [3] I don’t know if Goldman ever wrote up his lecture but here’s a link to someone else’s reconstruction,… [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 2:40 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Co. of N.Y., 98 NY2d 314, 326; Polonetsky v Better Homes Depot, 97 NY2d 46, 54; Guggenheimer v Ginzburg, 43 NY2d 268, 275; Peery v United Capital Corp., 84 AD3d 1201; Sokol v Leader, 74 AD3d 1180, 1180-1181; Reid v Gateway Sherman, Inc., 60 AD3d 836, 837; Roth v Goldman, 254 AD2d 405, 406), the complaint adequately stated a cause of action to recover damages for legal malpractice by alleging that during its… [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 7:49 am by Markus Sermons
The likely reason that the supervising officer let the driver go about his business is that the United States Supreme Court in the case of Delaware v. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 7:49 am by Markus Sermons
The likely reason that the supervising officer let the driver go about his business is that the United States Supreme Court in the case of Delaware v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 7:41 am by Joshua Matz
  On this blog, Orin Kerr previewed the search-related issue presented in United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2015, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
United States The privacy claim brought by wrestler Hulk Hogan against the “Gawker” gossip website arising out of the publication of a sex tape is due to commence in a Florida Court on 6 July 2015. [read post]
18 May 2009, 9:29 am
  That is why it will probably be more productive to see what happens to the American Airlines v. [read post]
10 May 2012, 2:45 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Co. of N.Y., 98 NY2d at 326; Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d at 87-88; Peery v United Capital Corp., 84 AD3d 1201). [read post]