Search for: "United States v. Gomez"
Results 281 - 300
of 360
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2009, 1:28 am
Int'l Trade Comm'n changed the accepted wisdom regarding the commission's power to issue broad injunctive relief excluding infringing articles from importation into the United States. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(Afro-IP) Peru Peru approves ratification of PCT (Patent Docs) (Managing Intellectual Property) Philippines Government says Philippines should be removed from US government watch list, despite claims from American lobby groups (ContentAgenda) Poland DIX versus DIX or judgment versus judgment (Class 46) PPO’s invalidates figurative mark belonging to FIRMA BATCZEW Stanislaw Komperda incorporating elements similar to EU flag (Class 46) Russia Video… [read post]
21 Feb 2009, 4:57 am
., the Supreme Court will hear Rivera v. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 11:00 am
See, e.g., Gomez v. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 5:35 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit limited recovery to the attorney's cost. 472 F. 3d 1370 (2006). [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 8:47 am
In Microsoft v. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 10:36 pm
United States, 216 F.R.D. 478, 480 (D. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 3:49 pm
Gomez-Gomez, No. 05-41461 Sentence for illegally reentering the United States is affirmed by the court sitting en banc, where a prior sex offense committed using constructive, i.e. nonphysical, force qualified as a "forcible sex offense" for sentence-enhancement purposes. [read post]
26 Oct 2008, 11:23 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Oct 2008, 5:34 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 10:11 am
The Court noted that the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit considered the question in United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2008, 4:52 am
Garre as United States Solicitor General. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 6:53 pm
Six days later, Gomez was arrested at the Mexico-United States border and charged with the instant offense of attempted reentry. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 9:33 pm
(United States v. [read post]
6 Sep 2008, 8:39 am
See United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 1:00 pm
State v. [read post]
23 Jul 2008, 1:31 pm
United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 6:32 pm
In the case, Myrna Gomez-Perez was employed by the United States Postal Service (USPS) and was 45 years old at the time when she requested a job transfer. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 2:42 pm
Earlier coverage of Medellin v. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 4:16 am
" (Gregg v. [read post]
