Search for: "United States v. Gomez"
Results 301 - 320
of 331
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Dec 2008, 5:35 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit limited recovery to the attorney's cost. 472 F. 3d 1370 (2006). [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 10:18 pm
These Conferences brought together large numbers of Chicano youth from throughout the United States and provided them with opportunities to express their views on self-determination. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 3:21 pm
These Conferences brought together large numbers of Chicano youth from throughout the United States and provided them with opportunities to express their views on self-determination. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 3:00 pm
Gomez v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:34 am
Rodriguez-Amaya, No. 06-4514 Conviction for unlawful reentry after deportation by an aggravated felon is affirmed where the time defendant was detained by United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement on administrative charges pending his removal was not detention "in connection with" his arrest, thus defendant's indictment did not violate the Speedy Trial Act. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 2:17 pm
Seeking relief from the ban, over one thousand plaintiffs joined together to file the lawsuit Gomez, et al. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 4:18 am
Qualified Immunity: Federal law provides a cause of action for individuals who have been “depriv[ed] of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws” of the United States by a person acting under the color of law. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 9:47 am
Gomez-Herrera, No. 07-10153 A sentence for illegal reentry following removal is affirmed over a primary claim that Kimbrough v. [read post]
29 Oct 2023, 6:15 pm
Co. v Campbell (538 US 408 [2003]), and Gomez v Cabatic (159 AD3d 62 [2d Dept 2018]). [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 4:29 am
But it soon became apparent the two sides had deeply divergent interests.The Bacardi family fled Cuba and dispersed to The Bahamas, Puerto Rico and elsewhere in the Caribbean and the United States. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 5:02 am
The decision represents an early response by a federal trial judge to a question the United States Supreme Court left open in last month’s decision in Campbell-Ewald Co. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 5:02 am
The decision represents an early response by a federal trial judge to a question the United States Supreme Court left open in last month’s decision in Campbell-Ewald Co. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2011, 6:20 am
For the facts, see United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 5:15 am
Boston Scientific Corp., 433 F.3d 1, 5 (1st Cir. 2006)(holding that SOX has no application to employees outside the United States). [read post]
28 May 2022, 2:25 pm
First, it’s ridiculous to call the Castle Rock v. [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 5:30 am
Mar. 31, 2015) (granting summary judgment); Carlsen v. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 5:57 am
The [Colorado anti-SLAPP] statute allows a person (usually a defendant) to file a special motion to dismiss "[a] cause of action against a person arising from any act of that person in furtherance of the person's right of petition or free speech under the United States constitution or the state constitution in connection with a public issue. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 8:47 am
In Microsoft v. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 12:58 pm
There are state specific laws on the subject which varies from state to state. [read post]
16 May 2024, 1:24 pm
The United States Department of Labor (DOL) is charged with enforcing the requirements of ERISA. [read post]
