Search for: "United States v. Goodwill"
Results 1 - 20
of 486
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2012, 5:56 pm
United States, a dentist, Larry E. [read post]
29 May 2015, 1:36 am
As the court stated, reiterating Lord Justice Oliver in Anheuser-Buch v Budejovicky Budvar NP, that goodwill is very much "localized" and that "...reputation which may, no doubt, and frequently does, exist without any supporting local business… does not by itself constitute a property which the law protects". [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 11:35 am
However, the United States District Court for the Middle District Florida helped clarify this issue in North American Products Corp. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 2:57 am
United States, 2009 WL 211067 (1st Cir. 2009). [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 7:04 pm
While United States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 4:13 pm
--Court: United States District Court for the District of NebraskaOpinion Date: 1/29/10Cite: RSG, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 1:25 pm
(f) Goodwill as a trade, business or professional asset shall be deemed to be situated at the place where the trade, business or profession to which it pertains is carried on. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 5:37 am
In Fait v. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 7:56 am
” However, when it comes to determining the applicability of the Federal Arbitration Act, the United States Supreme Court recently held non-competes should be treated the same as any other contract The Nitro-Lift Decision In Nitro-Lift Technologies, L.L.C. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 1:29 pm
Holly Hill Fruit Prods., 75 F.2d 13, 15 (5th Cir. 1935); see United Drug Co. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 9:39 am
I've added a statement on the case from The Owners' Rights Initiative, about the Supreme Court ruling that even books purchased outside the United States are subject to the 'First Sale Doctrine' as long as they are legally purchased (piracy is still a no-no), and brought into the United States. [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 1:20 am
One still has to appreciate that the copyright holder can at any time reassert their rights, and thus the copyright in the works is newly resurrected (although, as evident from the above, was never gone to begin with).Our cousins in the United States do accept the abandonment of copyrights in works. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 12:33 pm
A recent federal district court opinion, Howard v. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 6:47 am
True Organic Products, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 5:07 am
In 2008 the hearing officer found that the goodwill accrued by the group between 1963 and 1966 had long dissipated [an appropriate word, notes Merpel, given that few groups at that time gave the appearance of being anything like as dissipated as the Animals] by the date of Steel's application, despite the minor top-ups provided by half-hearted reunions, re-releases of the same song, and its induction into a United States museum. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 6:26 am
United States, 2009 WL 211067 (1st Cir. 2009). [read post]
25 May 2012, 7:29 am
The United States Supreme Court’s decisions in Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 2:59 am
--Court: United States District Court for the District of New MexicoOpinion Date: 4/23/09Cite: Resource Associates Grant Writing and Evaluation Services, LLC v. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 11:35 am
The Court of Appeals decision in ITC Ltd. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 3:00 am
A Spanish importer/distributor sold Spanish Kids dolls in the United States. [read post]
