Search for: "United States v. Goodwill"
Results 1 - 20
of 486
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2024, 6:05 am
” As Congress later elaborated, “engaging in educational, cultural and other exchanges with persons from around the world” can “significantly promote the foreign policy objectives of encouraging democracy and human rights abroad, and improving understanding of and goodwill toward the United States abroad. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 4:38 am
Miss United States of America LLC, DBA United States of America Pageants v.Abundance Productions, LLC, Cancellation No. 92071814 (March 8, 2024) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Melanye K. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 9:45 am
Bills restricting the use of noncompete provisions are also pending in other states, including Iowa, Maine, Michigan, New Jersey, and Oklahoma. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
In 2012, the case of Louboutin v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 3:42 pm
In McDonnell v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 11:16 am
The law, in its preamble, stated these objectives: WHEREAS, the People’s Republic of China is an adversary of the United States and Montana and has an interest in gathering information about Montanans, Montana companies, and the intellectual property of users to engage in corporate and international espionage…. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 1:32 pm
Recall notice: Eli Lilly & Co. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 11:08 am
In March, the Illinois law firm, MillerKing brought the putative class action against DoNotPay on behalf of “all law firms in the United States,” alleging false association and false advertising under the federal Lanham Act and Illinois state law. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 10:08 pm
Simultaneously, the defendants filed a suit in the United States District Court, asserting non-infringement of the plaintiffs’ rights. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 7:42 am
[I will blog the NetChoice v. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 2:04 am
The only exception to the exclusive licence was said to be “Ford’s existing non-exclusive licence in the United Kingdom”.CSL argued that the express carve-out for the United Kingdom could only make sense if the 1997 licence was being granted worldwide, and that the reference to “federal” marks was simply loose language. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 2:56 pm
For example, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, in Chen v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 8:32 am
Hetronic International Inc., the Supreme Court held that the Lanham Act does not reach trademark infringement that occurs outside of the United States (US). [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 2:43 pm
Co. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 2:43 pm
Co. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 4:41 pm
There's an FTC v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 4:26 am
PepsiCo, Inc. v. [read post]
31 May 2023, 6:59 am
On May 25, 2023, the Supreme Court issued its long-awaited decision in Sackett v. [read post]
31 May 2023, 6:59 am
On May 25, 2023, the Supreme Court issued its long-awaited decision in Sackett v. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 8:24 am
In contrast, the seller’s business was generally limited to the Northwest area of the United States. [read post]
