Search for: "United States v. Goodwill"
Results 21 - 40
of 486
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2023, 7:03 am
As Abitron wrote in it its brief: these “were sales in foreign countries, by foreign sellers, to foreign customers, for use in foreign countries, that never reached the United States or confused U.S. consumers. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 11:24 am
In Indiana State District Council of Laborers & Hod Carriers Pension & Welfare Fund v. [read post]
13 May 2015, 4:37 am
People in the United Kingdom cannot receive PCCM's closed circuit service. [read post]
24 Jan 2010, 2:07 pm
Many have already weighed in on Citizens United v. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 3:06 am
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia reversed the TTAB's ruling in Bayer Consumer Care AG v. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 11:55 am
Vault Cargo Management, LLC v. [read post]
31 May 2023, 6:59 am
On May 25, 2023, the Supreme Court issued its long-awaited decision in Sackett v. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 3:52 am
In short: no trade, no trademark.Two US Court of Appeals opinions have created the possibility that a plaintiff could bring a passing-off action based on use of its trademark outside of the United States only – a powerful new tool for challenging infringers that are first to use the trademark in the United StatesFollowing the Supreme Court’s 2014 decision in Lexmark International, Inc v Static Control Components, Inc (572 US ___, 134 S Ct 1377 (2014)),… [read post]
31 May 2023, 6:59 am
On May 25, 2023, the Supreme Court issued its long-awaited decision in Sackett v. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 1:52 pm
As explained in the case of United Biscuits v Asda [1997] RPC 513, customers might be misled by the similarities of get-up, confusion has a broad interpretation and does not require an intention to deceive. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 12:23 pm
The Court stated the question thus: Does the Lanham Act allow the owner of a foreign mark that is not registered in the United States and further has never used the mark in United States commerce assert priority rights over the mark that is registered in the United States by another party and used in United States commerce? [read post]
20 Apr 2014, 4:35 pm
The courts in the United States do not recognize the "well-known mark" basis for relief (but see Grupo Gigante v. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 3:43 am
It noted that in Belmora, Bayer acknowledged that it did not use the mark FLANAX in the United States; here Coca-Cola proved that is products are sold by third-party importers in the United States. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:01 am
A recent United States Tax Court case, Gaines v. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 1:26 am
In the United States, under various State legislation, an individual's personality or persona can be protected; something that isn't protectable per say under UK legislation.Some faces are just made for t-shirtsNevertheless, the protection offered under passing off can potentially extend to individuals, at least on a prima facie application of the requisite elements: there has to be goodwill associated with that individual; a misrepresentation as to that… [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 3:30 pm
Malik v United Kingdom 23780/08 [2012] ECHR 438 (13 March 2012) - Read judgment The European Court of Human Rights held that the suspension of a GP from the Primary Care Trust (PCT) Performers List did not violate his right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions under Article 1 Protocol 1 (A1P1) of the European Convention on Human Rights. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 5:01 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 1:00 pm
The recent judgment of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom in Cavendish Square Holding BV v Talal El Makdessi is a must-read for anyone involved in contract law. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 7:25 am
AFL Telecommunications LLC v. [read post]
26 Jan 2007, 12:18 am
Not for Publication United States District Court, S.D. [read post]
