Search for: "United States v. Goodwill"
Results 61 - 80
of 486
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2020, 4:13 pm
United States Patent & Trademark Office v. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 8:28 pm
United States [U.S. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 10:42 am
” A recent case from the United States Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals held that a trade name can be “distinct” when it incorporates two generic terms which are not typically linked together. [read post]
11 May 2012, 10:31 am
It is also settled, says the Guicci Court, that “a showing of consumer confusion or harm to plaintiff’s goodwill in the United States is sufficient to demonstrate a substantial effect on interstate commerce”. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 5:23 am
In ITC Ltd v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 5:54 am
People’s United Bank v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 4:09 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Cardinal Vaughan Memorial School, R (on the application of) v The Archbishop of Westminster & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 433 (14 April 2011) H and L v A City Council [2011] EWCA Civ 403 (14 April 2011) Marcroft v Heartland (Midlands) Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 438 (14 April 2011) Desai v National Car Parks Services (NCP) [2011] EWCA Civ 402 (14 April 2011) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Deeney, R. v [2011] EWCA Crim 893 (14… [read post]
10 Jan 2016, 6:00 am
Justice Manson had suggested that the doctrine was not applicable in Canada, stating: Some United States Courts have held such use can cause “initial interest confusion”, where confusion is caused in the customer before actually purchasing a good or service, when the customer seeks a particular brand of goods or services, but is drawn or enticed to a competitor’s goods or services through the competitor’s use of the first company’s trade name… [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 6:54 am
--Court: United States Court of Appeals for the First CircuitOpinion Date: 2/12/10Cite: ANSYS, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 9:35 am
In 1952, the court held in Steele v. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 9:53 am
. — F.Supp.2d —-, 2007 WL 43747 (S.D.Ohio) United States District Court, S.D. [read post]
12 Nov 2018, 1:12 pm
Sti. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 11:35 am
ArcSoft, Inc. v. [read post]
Funrise Toys Sues Over Copyright and Trademark Infringement Of Its Bubble Toy Machine In Los Angeles
3 Mar 2008, 12:26 am
The case is titled: Funrise, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 10:00 pm
”Ang et al v. [read post]
11 Jun 2022, 12:47 pm
Some background Until 2008, Lehman Brothers1 was one of the largest investment banks in the United States, with hundreds of billions of dollars in assets under management and more than 25,000 employees in offices worldwide. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 1:42 pm
LEXIS 57220, April 3, 2013) and permitted an inmate to proceed with his free exercise claim that authorities seized two religious books from his cell.In Goodwill v. [read post]
7 Dec 2007, 7:01 am
This list was compiled by United Cerebral Palsy. [read post]
Precedential No. 15: TTAB Refuses Concurrent Use Registration of DELMONICO'S For Restaurant Services
15 Jun 2015, 3:12 am
Southwestern Management, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 8:26 am
--Court: United States District Court for the District of UtahOpinion Date: 7/2/09Cite: Bad Ass Coffee Co. of Hawaii, Inc. v. [read post]
