Search for: "United States v. Goodwin" Results 61 - 80 of 253
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Nov 2011, 9:20 am by webmaster
Kraweloc’s co-counsel, Michael Rubin, responded that the decision would have retroactive effect, pursuant to controlling United States Supreme Court authority. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 3:00 am by Terry Hart
As part of its investigation, the United States served a search warrant on Carpathia. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
A law which confers a discretion is not in itself inconsistent with this requirement, provided the scope of the discretion and the manner of its exercise are indicated with sufficient clarity to give the individual protection against interference which is arbitrary: Goodwin v United Kingdom (1996) 22 EHRR 123 , para 31; Sorvisto v Finland , para 112. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 10:56 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Co-authored by Kara Goodwin and Noah Finkel Pending before the United States Supreme Court is a petition for writ of certiorari asking the Court to determine whether an employer may use payments for bona fide meal periods as an offset/credit against compensable work time. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 6:38 am by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
  While serving on the United States Supreme Court, he was tapped by President Harry Truman to be the lead prosecutor for the United States in the Nuremburg trials. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 8:25 pm by Sri Medicherla
Environmental Protection Agency announced a final rule that revised the definition of “waters of the United States,” limiting the agency’s authority to address water pollution. [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 7:37 am by Michele Goodwin
Future historians may credit the nomination and, if confirmed, the first Black woman on the United States Supreme Court, to President Joe Biden for fulfilling a campaign promise. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 12:32 am
Is it the United States? [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 6:44 am by James Bickford
United States, in which a sentence for selling crack cocaine was reduced below the Federal Guidelines minimum. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
In Goodwin v United Kingdom (2002)  the Strasbourg Court held that this inability of the English law to recognise and give effect to a change of gender through gender re-assignment surgery was a violation of a person’s Article 8 rights. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 5:57 am by Adam Chandler
United States, released earlier this month. [read post]