Search for: "United States v. Grace" Results 261 - 280 of 622
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2015, 12:30 am by Emily Prifogle
"When and how did the United States ­become a nation? [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 11:56 am by Ken White
Angels and ministers of grace defend us, what have I done. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
Third, the Manual authors state that the doubling argument assumes the “[n]onacceleration of disease. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 1:29 pm by Amy Howe
The United States also filed an amicus brief supporting the challengers. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 4:22 am by SHG
Among the few saving graces of the New York Court of Appeals was its stand-alone protection of constitutional rights. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 4:42 am by SHG
The speech is protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 4:30 am by SHG
Chemerinsky notes in the cert petition that 9th Circuit Chief Judge Alex Kozinski wrote in his dissent from denial of en banc review in United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
The recent outbreak of measles—a highly contagious childhood disease that had been nearly eradicated in the United States—has focused mostly negative attention on parents who choose not to vaccinate their children. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 6:43 am by Schachtman
The present workman’s compensation system in the United States has serious flaws. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 4:01 am
At present, the US Supreme Court is considering whether the case merits its further review, and has now invited the Solicitor General, Donald Verrilli, to "file a brief in the case expressing the view of the United States" (see here for an explanation of the Solicitor General's role). [read post]
24 Dec 2014, 5:00 am
  In this case the United States Supreme Court held that a state attorney general action (really brought by contingent fee counsel proceeding in an AG’s name), ostensibly on behalf of all the citizens of a state, did not qualify as a “mass action” under the Class Action Fairness Act (“CAFA”) so as to allow removal to federal court. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 4:30 am
That doctrine comes into play when: (1) the federal plaintiff lost in state court; (2) the plaintiff complains of some injury from the state court judgment; (3) the state court judgment antedated the filing of the federal case; and (4) the plaintiff is inviting the federal court to reject the state court judgment.   The plaintiffs appealed that decision to the Third Circuit, and that’s where we are today: Johnson v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 9:27 am by Wells Bennett
Klayman tells the panel that he doesn’t trust the United States’ explanation for his clie [read post]