Search for: "United States v. Grace"
Results 281 - 300
of 655
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Aug 2013, 1:30 pm
United States. [read post]
10 Jan 2016, 7:49 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2020, 11:49 am
In the seminal case of Dames & Moore v. [read post]
7 Nov 2009, 3:40 pm
Cuomo v. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 3:44 am
United States, the decision holding that the use of infrared thermal imaging devices to detect a marijuana grow house constitutes a search and thus requires a warrant. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 5:41 am
He relied on "the principles laid down in United States v. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 7:51 am
United States. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 7:00 am
Here's the abstract:Upon finding that a government program is unconstitutional, courts in the United States sometimes allow executive officials a grace period to wind it down rather than insisting on its immediate cessation. [read post]
31 Mar 2007, 7:55 am
United States, 180 F.3d 349, 354 (1st Cir. 1999) (one year grace period in for petitions after effective date of AEDPA) applies because Congress's control over immigration proceedings is "plenary. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 7:59 am
Accordingly, the General Court endorsed the Board of Appeal’s position that two grace periods were applicable. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court ruled, in United States v. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 12:05 pm
IN RE: GRACE OLAECHEA VS. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:16 pm
Sibelius v. [read post]
27 Aug 2019, 7:17 am
See also Stone v. [read post]
27 Aug 2019, 7:17 am
See also Stone v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 10:32 pm
Supreme Court Ruling in Dobbs v. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 8:24 am
A good example of this dynamic at work can be seen in Judge Young’s just released ruling out of the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts in Bunch v. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 9:21 am
Ass’n v. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 4:30 am
That doctrine comes into play when: (1) the federal plaintiff lost in state court; (2) the plaintiff complains of some injury from the state court judgment; (3) the state court judgment antedated the filing of the federal case; and (4) the plaintiff is inviting the federal court to reject the state court judgment. The plaintiffs appealed that decision to the Third Circuit, and that’s where we are today: Johnson v. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 12:35 pm
Castrillon agreed to organize the smuggling of 100 kilos of marijuana, worth $70,000 to $100,000, from Tijuana to the United States. [read post]
