Search for: "United States v. Grace"
Results 321 - 340
of 656
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Dec 2014, 4:30 am
That doctrine comes into play when: (1) the federal plaintiff lost in state court; (2) the plaintiff complains of some injury from the state court judgment; (3) the state court judgment antedated the filing of the federal case; and (4) the plaintiff is inviting the federal court to reject the state court judgment. The plaintiffs appealed that decision to the Third Circuit, and that’s where we are today: Johnson v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 9:27 am
Klayman tells the panel that he doesn’t trust the United States’ explanation for his clie [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 6:38 am
The style of the case is, Fernandez v. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 11:26 am
In United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 2:09 pm
Burwell (lease, Indian Health Service)United States v. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 3:47 pm
(Indian Child Welfare Act, placement) Grace L. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2014, 2:28 pm
For a very similar example, consider United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 4:24 am
Automated Solutions Corporation v. [read post]
10 Aug 2014, 8:00 pm
Editor’s note: This post is republished with permission from the RLUIPA Defense blog which can be viewed here: http://www.rluipa-defense.com/home.cfm The United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida has denied the City of Jacksonville’s motion to dismiss Church of Our Savior’s (formerly known as Resurrection Anglican Church) RLUIPA suit, and has scheduled the case for trial. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 2:51 am
We’re a neutrality state. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 12:00 am
Instead, in the case of United States of America v. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 12:00 am
Instead, in the case of United States of America v. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 1:41 pm
Not in lots of states. [read post]
28 Jun 2014, 4:24 am
United States, 232 U.S. 383 (1914), our jurisprudence lurched back and forth between imposing a categorical warrant requirement and looking to reasonableness alone. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 11:59 am
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Syllabus REPUBLIC OF ARGENTINA v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 6:36 am
Media reports indicate that this Ordinance was drafted during the previous regime under the United Progressive Alliance. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:16 pm
Sibelius v. [read post]
19 Apr 2014, 7:35 am
This case is from the United States District Court, Northern District, Fort Worth Division. [read post]
30 Mar 2014, 5:48 pm
Finally, I want to end with Nimmer’s prediction about the prospect of a new copyright act in the United States. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
Last year, in Elane Photography v. [read post]
