Search for: "United States v. Grace" Results 381 - 400 of 655
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Mar 2020, 2:30 pm by Joel R. Brandes
Both of these adjustments are based on increases in the Consumer Price Index for all urban consumers (CPI-U) published by the United States Department of Labor. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 12:04 pm by Elina Saxena, Quinta Jurecic
Over at the Times, President Jimmy Carter urges states involved in the Syrian conflict to push for a political solution and calls for five-way negotiations between the United States, Turkey, Russia, Iran, and the Syrian regime. [read post]
While the claims before the Federal Court were not in relation to Commonwealth or State government orders during the latest Delta outbreak, her Honour noted that unlike the United Kingdom, where COVID-19 outbreaks were “so widespread” and virtually everywhere, Australia was a large and sparsely populated country with far fewer COVID-19 cases. [read post]
19 Oct 2006, 6:33 am
Macy's saving grace was based on the United States and the California Constitutions, which both prevent discriminatory tax schemes like this one, typically referred to as a "tandem tax. [read post]
13 Nov 2016, 9:36 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Grace and Co. mine that was one of the largest asbestos mines in the United States and is responsible for thousands of cases of mesothelioma over the years. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 2:18 pm by Lyle Denniston
  The lower court decision at issue was set aside March 1 by the Supreme Court (Kiyemba v. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 1:26 pm by Jim von der Heydt
  It is, in fact, impossible to conceive how it could have done so more overtly than in Bush v. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 6:36 am
In the US: This ideal state can realized by embracing truth as it exists outside of an individual – either in divine command (or grace, or law) or in the inspired will of the community at its most potent. [read post]
20 May 2022, 2:13 am by Florian Mueller
Google described it as a mere clarification, though I would agree with Epic and others that in reality it constituted a policy change, an about-face.By "[f]or the time being" I meant that this is just temporary, like a moratorium:At the very latest, this agreement terminates when the United States District Court for the Northern District of California has entered final judgment in, or otherwise disposed of, Epic Games v. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 7:14 pm by Linda McClain
Without embracing the equation made in Reynolds v. [read post]
24 Dec 2014, 5:00 am
  In this case the United States Supreme Court held that a state attorney general action (really brought by contingent fee counsel proceeding in an AG’s name), ostensibly on behalf of all the citizens of a state, did not qualify as a “mass action” under the Class Action Fairness Act (“CAFA”) so as to allow removal to federal court. [read post]
17 May 2023, 4:54 am by Michael C. Dorf
A First Amendment challenge to the law made it to the Supreme Court itself, which, in United States v. [read post]