Search for: "United States v. Grand Jury Investigation" Results 1 - 20 of 971
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2024, 10:02 am by John Floyd
  Within this due process safeguard (made applicable to the states by the Fourteen Amendment), the “right to remain silent” was born in 1966 in Miranda v. [read post]
Dreeben also explained that a prosecutor still must have enough evidence to warrant a grand jury to indict a former president to meet constitutional requirements. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 11:53 am by Steven Calabresi
United States on jurisdictional grounds is a far better way of deciding Trump v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 5:45 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Thus, the declarations were not subject to the general rule of grand jury secrecy because they were not “evidence actually presented to [the grand jury]” nor “anything that may tend to reveal what transpired before it” (see United States v Eastern Air Lines, Inc., 923 F2d 241, 244 [2d Cir 1991], citing Fed Rules Crim Pro rule 6 [e] [2]). [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 4:07 pm by Lundgren & Johnson, PSC
Constitutional Rights Constitutional rights refer to the rights bestowed upon everyone by the United States and Minnesota constitutions. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 3:00 am by Jeff Welty
” Of course, in Ex Parte United States, the probable cause determination was made by the grand jury while the warrant was sought from a judge. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 5:31 am by Ashley Morgan
When the FDA approves a drug for sale in the United States, the FDA includes a section in the drugs package insert titled "Indications for Use. [read post]
20 Jan 2024, 9:24 pm by Norman L. Eisen
At the time of his motion, Jones was the “target” of a special purpose grand jury investigation into the facts of this case. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
But officials broke "[v]irtually every promise" they made. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 3:25 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Thus, the declarations were not subject to the general rule of grand jury secrecy because they were not “evidence actually presented to [the grand jury]” nor “anything that may tend to reveal what transpired before it” (see United States v Eastern Air Lines, Inc., 923 F2d 241, 244 [2d Cir 1991], citing Fed Rules Crim Pro rule 6[e][2]). [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 12:00 pm by Barbara McQuade
On Dec. 7, one week before the fake electoral votes were cast, District Judge Linda V. [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 4:28 am by Mark Graber
  Judge Emmons charged the grand jury that “[t]he oath which shall have been taken need not be in the precise words of the amendment” “To support the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 7:17 pm by Michael Lowe
Automated Medical Laboratories, Inc., 770 F.2d 399, 407 (4th Cir. 1985) and United States v. [read post]