Search for: "United States v. Grand Jury Investigation" Results 301 - 320 of 995
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2019, 2:18 pm by Jonathan Shaub
There appeared to be legitimate reasons to support Trump’s first use of this formerly unusual device: The House judiciary committee had given the Justice Department essentially two weeks to comply with a sweeping subpoena covering millions of pages of documents, many which included potentially sensitive information, including classified and grand jury information. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 5:20 am by Jack Sharman
  As in the United States, the communication, to be protected, must  concern the offering or receiving of legal advice (as opposed to business advice or strategic counsel). [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 11:27 am by Jon Roland
However, we can create a bill of indictment or impeachment based on those findings.The “fact” elements in the Report are stated in biased language, which is normal for prosecutors seeking grand jury indictment. [read post]
29 May 2019, 7:10 pm by Martin H. Orlick
On May 23, 2019, United States Attorneys filed a Grand Jury Indictment, United States of America v. [read post]
On May 23, 2019, United States Attorneys filed a Grand Jury Indictment, United States of America v. [read post]
21 May 2019, 10:57 am by Molly E. Reynolds, Margaret Taylor
From the beginning of the Federal Government, presidents have stated that in an impeachment inquiry the Executive Branch could be required to produce papers that it might with‐hold in a legislative investigation. [read post]
14 May 2019, 4:47 am by Andrew Kent
And third, as Daniel Hemel and Eric Posner have pointed out, the Supreme Court did not apply a clear statement in United States v. [read post]
7 May 2019, 8:30 am by Scott Bomboy
” Another interesting dispute over inherent contempt citations took place in 1917, when a House subcommittee had United States attorney H. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 2:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
One of the cases referenced in the Mueller Report is United States v Aguilar, 515 U.S. 593 (1995), in which the Court held that uttering false statements to an investigating agent who might or might not testify before a grand jury is not sufficient to constitute obstruction. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 2:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
One of the cases referenced in the Mueller Report is United States v Aguilar, 515 U.S. 593 (1995), in which the Court held that uttering false statements to an investigating agent who might or might not testify before a grand jury is not sufficient to constitute obstruction. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 10:16 am by John Jascob
He also subpoenaed two women’s health clinics for medical records, communications among doctors and with third parties, presumably including the United States. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 5:00 am by Neil Siegel
When the President gave the order, “substantial evidence” (to quote the Report) existed that the President was aware that he was under investigation by a federal prosecutor who could present evidence of the President’s criminality to a grand jury, which satisfies the nexus requirement. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 5:00 am by Justin Hemmings, Nathan Swire
Second, even under the Cloud Act, the United States can obtain information only via a lawful order pursuant to a criminal investigation, meaning that there would be judicial oversight of any request for information. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 1:12 pm by John Floyd
  We suspect that, because of McKeever, the Mueller grand jury materials will not see the light of day until a Democrat is appointed Attorney General of the United States. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 2:20 pm by Mark Graber
Mueller, “Report on the Investigation into Russian Interference in the 2016 Presidential Election (Volume II) (2019)Evidence emerged during the summer and fall of 2016 election that the Russian government was attempting to interfere with the presidential election in the United States. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 12:41 pm by Lev Sugarman
To organize those rallies, IRA employees posed as U.S. grassroots entities and persons and made contact with Trump supporters and Trump Campaign officials in the United States. [read post]