Search for: "United States v. Griffin"
Results 101 - 120
of 588
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2024, 12:46 pm
On Thursday, Februrary 8, I sat in the courtroom of the Supreme Court of the United States on assignment for JURIST to hear oral arguments in Trump v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 11:39 am
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani] State v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
Reversing theDistrict Court’s operative holding, the majority concludedthat for purposes of Section 3, the Presidency is an officeunder the United States and the President is an officer ofthe United States. [read post]
4 Nov 2007, 4:48 am
Compare United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 5:55 am
Hollowbreast, 425 U.S. 649 (1976); United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 9:01 pm
United States. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 4:05 am
United States, 2014 U.S. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 6:53 am
Flynn, and Sharon Block occurred while the United States Senate was in session and were made without seeking the advice and consent of the Senate, in violation of Article II, Section 2, Clause 2 of the Constitution. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 3:39 am
United States and the judicial-recusal case Williams v. [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 3:06 pm
United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 9:01 pm
In Fulton v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 3:26 pm
State v. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 5:33 am
United States and Perez v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 3:48 pm
The first installment focused on Justice Gorsuch's colloquies about Officers of the United States. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 1:31 pm
A judge today removed a county official from office under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, the hoary post-Civil War provision that bars certain people from holding office if they have “engaged in insurrection” against the United States. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 5:06 am
Yesterday’s argument in Yates v. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 2:22 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 9:20 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 1:00 pm
The Supreme Court agreed that the president of the United States does have the right to make recess appointments when the Senate is not available. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 12:41 pm
" And in Trump v. [read post]
