Search for: "United States v. Gross"
Results 441 - 460
of 1,615
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2023, 3:12 pm
United States District Judge Steven D. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
Home Concrete & Supply, LLC the United States Supreme Court (USSC) significantly restricted the IRS’ ability under §6501(e)(1)(A) to audit for up to six years. [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
”) … Canadian Trade Law BlogNegotiation, Not Litigation is the Way to NAFTA Modernization Rather than just negotiate NAFTA modernization, the United States is trying to use additional illegal tariffs on steel and aluminum, and now WTO litigation, to force Canada to accept its NAFTA position. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 2:07 pm
James Landolt v. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 3:30 pm
This morning the United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in the long-running Exxon-Valdez case, Exxon Shipping Company v. [read post]
25 May 2009, 5:18 pm
Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc., 160 N.J. 307 (1999) (bankruptcy sale order did not preclude application of product-line successor liability); Gross v. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 7:29 am
Dean v. [read post]
2 Apr 2025, 2:59 pm
(NEA), section 604 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2483), and section 301 of title 3, United States Code, I, DONALD J. [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 6:52 am
The Court agreed, holding that the district court incorrectly relied upon Sixth Circuit precedent in United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 5:30 am
Cardinale v. [read post]
14 May 2008, 7:58 pm
Our view of this change is that it was a purely economic decision made in favor of the developer because the construction of these units in gross dollars would result in over $120M in additional revenue. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 2:20 pm
Qualcomm Inc. v. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 6:22 am
The United States Coast Guard crews medevaced an ill thirteen year old from the Norwegian Cruise Line (NCL) Jewel cruise ship near Cape Hatteras, North Carolina on Saturday. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 3:00 am
Gross. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 10:30 am
The law expressly provides, however, that Act No. 5 “shall apply to all taxable periods beginning on or after the date of the final ruling of the United States Supreme Court in [South Dakota v. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 6:11 am
” Brief that makes this argument: The United States, filed in support of vacatur. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 2:08 pm
Voting 11-5, the United States Tax Court ruled on February 3 in O’Donnabhain v. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 5:01 am
A case in point is demonstrated by the United States Tax Courtorder in Swartz v. [read post]
17 Jan 2025, 1:25 pm
United States, the justices will decide a procedural question relating to appeals. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 5:19 am
Section 2515 provides as follows:Whenever any wire or oral communication has been intercepted, no part of the contents of such communication and no evidence derived therefrom may be received in evidence in any trial, hearing, or other proceeding in or before any court, grand jury, department, officer, agency, regulatory body, legislative committee, or other authority of the United States, a State, or a political subdivision thereof if the disclosure of that… [read post]
