Search for: "United States v. Haas" Results 61 - 80 of 99
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2011, 8:24 pm by legalinformatics
McKinnon, Univ of Wisconsin, Madison: Geopolitics and Human Rights Rhetoric in Recent Mexican LGBT Asylum Cases in the United States. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 1:24 pm by Schachtman
  The sordid affair is described in detail in a published decision of the United States Court of Appeals, In re School Asbestos Litigation, 977 F.2d 764 (3d Cir. 1992). [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm by Schachtman
That goal ultimately came to have bipartisan support in the United States, largely as a result of Selikoff’s advocacy. [read post]
22 Feb 2009, 4:25 pm
Article I, Section 10 of the United States Constitution. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 4:56 am by Marie Louise
Becton, Dickinson and Company (Patently-O) Patent malpractice litigation: State versus federal jurisdiction: Magnetek, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 7:26 pm by cdw
” (track for cert potential) United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 2:09 pm by admin
In the United States, federal agencies such as the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), or the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and their state analogues, regularly set exposure standards that could not and should not hold up in a common-law tort case. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 6:56 am
 Ben Challis, writing on the 1709 Blog, reports a not entirely unsurprising but nonetheless significant ruling from the United States that a download is not a performance for the purposes of copyright law. [read post]
23 Nov 2017, 9:30 pm by Sarah Madigan
Supreme Court case, Christie v. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 9:05 pm by Elizabeth Martinez
During debates, state Democrats argued that the bill is intended to challenge Arizona v. [read post]
26 Dec 2006, 3:32 am
In part V of this series, we will set out the legal framework for service businesses in China. [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 6:47 am
The decisions of Judge Colin Birss QC in the Patents County Court earlier this year in Dame Vivienne Westwood v Anthony Knight (noted by the IPKat here and here) made fascinating reading. [read post]
1 May 2009, 11:00 am
: In re Kubin and KSR International Co v Teleflex Inc (Patent Docs)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC: USPTO, Tafas & GSK request extension for reconsideration (IP Watchdog) CAFC: Patent on sex aid is obvious: Ritchie v Vast Resources (AKA Topco) (Patently-O) (Hal Wegner) CAFC: Assigning patent rights: Euclid Chemical v Vector Corrosion (Patently-O) (Hal Wegner) District Court E D Michigan: LEDdynamics wins summary judgment in LED tube patent suit… [read post]