Search for: "United States v. Harmon" Results 1 - 20 of 480
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Sep 2021, 9:32 am by Florian Mueller
Robart of the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, a thought leader on FRAND since his landmark Microsoft v. [read post]
The Court held that § 1782(a) does not “direct United States courts to engage in comparative analysis” of foreign and domestic discovery rules. [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 9:08 pm by Omar Khodor
Patent and Trademark Office updated its guidance related to the recent United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 6:01 am by Josh Blackman
Part V will consider the meaning of the phrase "office . . . under the United States," which appears in the Incompatibility Clause, the Impeachment Disqualification Clause, the Foreign Emoluments Clause, and the Elector Incompatibility Clause. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 7:56 am by Ion Meyn
In coming to this conclusion, my research team analyzed use-of-force videos produced over 10 years by Lexipol, the largest provider of police training in the United States. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 8:53 am by Dennis Crouch
There is a big (electronic) book known as the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (“HTSUS”) that is used to classify commercial imports. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 4:03 am by Peter Mahler
Simon v Moskowitz In Simon v Moskowitz, the Appellate Division affirmed in part and reversed in part a lower court’s order dismissing claims by a minority member against the majority member of a profitable, two-member LLC that owns a 60-unit, rental apartment building in the Bronx. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 2:04 pm
The assistance is reciprocal; tribunals in the United States may issue letters rogatory through the State Department to a “foreign or international tribunal, officer, or agency. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 11:53 am by Dennis Crouch
Together we represent thousands of organizations that employ millions of workers in the United States. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 9:33 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
The CAFC finds no judicial estoppel: Prior to claim construction, and alongside an ongoing inter partes review (“IPR”) proceeding, Egenera separately petitioned the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”) to remove one of the eleven listed inventors from the ’430 patent. [read post]
12 Aug 2020, 2:35 pm by Matthias Weller
BUXBAUM Montesquieu and the Cape Town Convention: of Bankruptcy and Civil Procedure Remo CAPONI Nuovi strumenti processuali europei di tutela collettiva Heather CLARK, Barbara CONCOLINO and Ana MORALES RAMOS The Broader Legacy of the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal Michel DESCHAMPS The Impact of the Cape Town Convention on the Assignment of Receivables Nina DETHLOFF Vielfalt oder Einheit? [read post]