Search for: "United States v. Harmon" Results 161 - 180 of 593
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2016, 6:44 pm
The effects have been profound, especially with respect to the role of states, and especially of the United States as its long time position in global affairs undergoes significant change. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 9:42 am by Jeremy Malcolm
One reason why the broader scope of United States trade secrets law has not become a major problem before now is the existence of the First Amendment. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 12:51 am by Kevin LaCroix
Nevertheless, IOSCO members (like the United States) regulate 95 percent of the world’s securities markets. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 5:26 pm by Larry
United States, in which the Court of Appeals discounted the legal impact of a definition in the Explanatory Notes.The case is about the classification of two stabilized forms of the chemical carnitine, which may or may not be a vitamin. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 4:33 pm
So far, unfortunately, efforts at harmonization have too often been in the direction of reproducing the costly features of United States tort doctrines — doctrines that have imposed spiraling costs on American manufacturers. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 7:00 am by admin
Harmon, 68, who grew up in one of those buildings — a bow-fronted town house on West 76th Street near Central Park — has gone to the United States Supreme Court contending that New York City’s rent laws constitute a taking of his property without just compensation, a violation of his constitutional rights. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 5:53 pm
Institutional Architecture of Law and Governance:  The United States and Law Making-- The Administrative Branches: The Non-Delegation Doctrine, An Introduction.Notes for--Mistretta v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 2:59 pm
In a recent case, the Court of Appeal for Ontario, Canada recognized the privacy torts that are widely-recognized in the United States. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 6:18 pm
United States, 535 U.S. 43 (2002)," and concluded that "the suspension provision applies here only if the Franchise Tax Board was precluded from collecting the debt by a stay of proceedings" during the Debtor's prior Ch. 13 case. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 7:51 am by Alan S. Kaplinsky
United States, 520 U.S. 651, 657, 117 S.Ct. 1573, 137 L.Ed.2d 917 (1997) (‘Ordinarily, where a specific provision conflicts with a general one, the specific governs. [read post]
28 Oct 2021, 10:00 am by Scott Hervey
On September 30, 2021, the United State Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit decided a much-anticipated copyright reversion case involving the slasher franchise, Friday the 13th. [read post]
29 May 2019, 4:12 am by Larry
United States has already had some coverage on the blog. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar
Notable state judicial review under state constitutions in fact predated the Philadelphia Convention and Marbury v. [read post]