Search for: "United States v. Hart"
Results 1 - 20
of 517
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Apr 2024, 6:32 am
Whereas Warren Court activism was generally in the service of democracy, some of the most egregious Roberts Court decisions--gutting the Voting Rights Act, invalidating bipartisan campaign finance regulation, rendering challenges to partisan gerrymandering impossible, and much more--seem designed to make government in the United States less democratic. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 5:04 pm
Professor Kate Sang has received £15,000 after the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, Michelle Donelan, wrongly accused her of supporting Hamas. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:13 am
Thankfully, no Justice wrote to give any credence at all to the absurd arguments that the President isn’t an “officer of the United States” or that the presidency isn’t an office “under the United States. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
” [34] There were still cases like Brown v. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 3:00 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:17 pm
568/20, J v. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 1:00 pm
This book traces the development of the jurisdiction from the foundational decisions of Huckle v Money and Wilkes v Wood in England, to leading modern cases such as Harris v Digital Pulse Pty Ltd in Australia, Whiten v Pilot Insurance Co in Canada, Couch v AG (No 2) in New Zealand, PH Hydraulics and Engineering Pte Ltd v Airtrust (Hong Kong) Ltd in Singapore and Mathias v Accor Economy Lodging, Inc and State Farm Mutual… [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm
United States, 139 S. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 2:17 pm
The choice of law in these disputes, as Henry Hart would say, is inherently federal. [read post]
16 Dec 2023, 4:20 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 7:54 am
On December 6, the Colorado Supreme Court heard oral argument in Griswold v. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 12:41 pm
" And in Trump v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
Consider the 2001 SCOTUS case of PGA Tour, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 9:30 pm
From Gladstone to Thatcher: The Shortage of Parliamentary Time in the United Kingdom and the Implications for Tax Legislation – and BeyondJohn H N Pearce (Formerly HMRC; Associate of the Institute of Taxation, UK)5. 'The normal meaning of securities is not open to doubt'; Viscount Cave in Singer v Williams (1920). [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 5:38 am
But maybe the wages of crying Roe for so long are having some such judges on the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
Finchett-Maddock & Andreas Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos, To Open Up: A performative rewriting of Pendragon v United Kingdom (1998) 27 EHRR CD 179 , (Helen Dancer, Bonnie Holligan and Helena Howe (eds.) [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
Part 1 of this piece can be found here. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
In 1972, the per se flood crested in U.S. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 4:28 pm
The volume on The Common Law Jurisprudence of the Conflict of Laws, edited by Sarah McKibbin (University of Southern Queensland) and Anthony Kennedy (Serle Court), recently published by Hart, does just that, by discussing cases like Vita Food Products, Brook v Brook, Bonython v Commonwealth of Australia, AG v Heinemann Publishers (better known as the Australian Spycatcher case), Bremen v Zapata, Vizcaya v Picard, and Kuwait Airways (Nos 4 and 5).… [read post]
