Search for: "United States v. Hasting" Results 1 - 20 of 456
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2025, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
About two weeks ago, the entire United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, by a 10-5 vote, declined to exercise en banc review of an important 2024 voting-rights case, Republican National Committee v. [read post]
12 Mar 2025, 9:01 pm by Lesley Wexler and Anthony Ghiotto
We also identify broader concerns such as possible trans baiting; the declining role and influence of military lawyers; the mismatch of Secretary of Defense Hegseth’s warrior ethos and the kind of service members needed for modern conflicts; and the new leadership’s flawed conception of unit cohesion.I. [read post]
9 Mar 2025, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
The Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, arguably the most important piece of law enacted anywhere in the world over the last two centuries, opens majestically with these words: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. [read post]
27 Jan 2025, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
The proposed Idaho Memorial (which would need to be approved on the floor of both houses of the state legislature before it would take effect) provides in part: We, your Memorialists, the House of Representatives and the Senate of the State of Idaho assembled in the First Regular Session of the Sixty-eighth Idaho Legislature, do hereby respectfully represent that: WHEREAS, the decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in Obergefell v. [read post]
20 Jan 2025, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
In Part I, I revisit the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Youngstown Steel v. [read post]
6 Jan 2025, 9:07 am by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court’s June 2024 decision in the SEC v. [read post]
31 Oct 2024, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
If a state can do that, we see no reason why a state cannot decide to treat ballots in the possession of the United States Postal Service (USPS) or similarly reliable common carriers in like fashion. [read post]
26 Sep 2024, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Ethan Yan
For those who haven’t looked at that Amendment recently, its words provide, quite straightforwardly, that, for citizens of the United States who are at least eighteen, the right to vote “shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or any state on account of age” (emphasis added).Indiana, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina, and Texas grant absentee-voting eligibility specifically for all voters sixty-five or older, while… [read post]
22 Aug 2024, 3:59 am by SHG
And then the Supreme Court ruled in United States v. [read post]