Search for: "United States v. Hasting" Results 221 - 240 of 467
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2013, 2:37 pm by Jack McNeill
Tobacco manufacturers and the United States government: ready for battle. [read post]
18 Nov 2007, 9:03 pm
There is an established right under the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution which prohibits the execution of one who is insane, as set forth by the United States Supreme Court in Ford v. [read post]
18 Nov 2007, 9:03 pm
There is an established right under the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution which prohibits the execution of one who is insane, as set forth by the United States Supreme Court in Ford v. [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 8:26 am by Quinta Jurecic
It represents the will of the American people to see Russia take steps to improve relations with the United States. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 4:13 am
Hasting, 461 U.S. 499, 505-06 (1983); United States. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 11:12 am by David Kopel
In 1998, the Supreme Court issued its most important modern decision on the Excessive Fines Clause, United States v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 4:01 pm by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Perhaps most notably, the elite mainstream media has repeatedly covered the problem of the unbefriended in the United States. [read post]
10 May 2010, 12:00 pm by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
Sponsor: Rep Hastings, Doc [WA-4] (introduced 4/29/2010) Cosponsors (None) Latest Major Action: 4/29/2010 By unanimous consent, the Hastings (WA) amendment was withdrawn. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 5:09 am by Broc Romanek
At issue was the interpretation of the indenture's "Public Acquirer Change of Control" definition, which depends in relevant part on whether: "a Person who ... acquires the Company ... has a class of common stock traded on a United States national securities exchange or the Nasdaq National Market. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 11:13 am
Bryza is suggesting that a lame-duck President who, I hope, will have been soundly repudiated in November by the victory of Obama-Biden, would view himself as having the legitimate authority to bind the United States to the defense of Georgia's territorial integrity (at least if one takes Article V of NATO seriously). [read post]
24 May 2011, 12:26 am by Orin Kerr
United States, 308 U.S. 338 (1939).If you think about it, this was a rather ridiculous rule. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 2:00 am by John Day
Walgreen Hastings Co., 126 P.2d 774 (N.M. 1998); but see Wilson v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 9:44 am by Jack McNeill
The resurgence of secularism: hostility towards religion in the United States and France. [read post]