Search for: "United States v. Hasting" Results 241 - 260 of 519
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Nov 2007, 9:03 pm
There is an established right under the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution which prohibits the execution of one who is insane, as set forth by the United States Supreme Court in Ford v. [read post]
18 Nov 2007, 9:03 pm
There is an established right under the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution which prohibits the execution of one who is insane, as set forth by the United States Supreme Court in Ford v. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 4:13 am
Hasting, 461 U.S. 499, 505-06 (1983); United States. v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 12:00 pm by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
Sponsor: Rep Hastings, Doc [WA-4] (introduced 4/29/2010) Cosponsors (None) Latest Major Action: 4/29/2010 By unanimous consent, the Hastings (WA) amendment was withdrawn. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 5:09 am by Broc Romanek
At issue was the interpretation of the indenture's "Public Acquirer Change of Control" definition, which depends in relevant part on whether: "a Person who ... acquires the Company ... has a class of common stock traded on a United States national securities exchange or the Nasdaq National Market. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 11:13 am
Bryza is suggesting that a lame-duck President who, I hope, will have been soundly repudiated in November by the victory of Obama-Biden, would view himself as having the legitimate authority to bind the United States to the defense of Georgia's territorial integrity (at least if one takes Article V of NATO seriously). [read post]
6 May 2020, 12:12 pm by Peter Margulies
§ 1182(f), which empowers the president to bar entry of foreign nationals who would be "detrimental to the interests of the United States. [read post]
24 May 2011, 12:26 am by Orin Kerr
United States, 308 U.S. 338 (1939).If you think about it, this was a rather ridiculous rule. [read post]
 Hurley, Texas (shorthand for the state challengers), and the Solicitor General (or “SG” for the intervening United States) argue that the insurance requirement cannot be severed and thus the entire ACA must fall. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 2:00 am by John Day
Walgreen Hastings Co., 126 P.2d 774 (N.M. 1998); but see Wilson v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 9:44 am by Jack McNeill
The resurgence of secularism: hostility towards religion in the United States and France. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts tried (obviously unsuccessfully) to avoid the complete overturning of Roe v. [read post]