Search for: "United States v. Hasting"
Results 101 - 120
of 510
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Dec 2020, 9:01 pm
In the first four parts of our series on the California v. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 9:36 am
The September 2 order of the United States District Court for the Central District of California is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit with instructions to remand to the District Court for further consideration in light of Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn v. [read post]
22 Nov 2020, 4:20 pm
United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 6:06 pm
Gore, in its haste, failed to address the precedent of Taylor v. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
Hurley, Texas (shorthand for the state challengers), and the Solicitor General (or “SG” for the intervening United States) argue that the insurance requirement cannot be severed and thus the entire ACA must fall. [read post]
25 Oct 2020, 5:46 pm
United States USA today had a piece “Rudy Giuliani’s ‘Borat 2’ scene: What can he do about it legally? [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 1:21 pm
In United States v. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 6:28 pm
The DOL rule, “Strengthening Wage Protections for the Temporary and Permanent Employment of Certain Aliens in the United States,” takes effect immediately on publication (October 8, 2020). [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 6:28 pm
The DOL rule, “Strengthening Wage Protections for the Temporary and Permanent Employment of Certain Aliens in the United States,” takes effect immediately on publication (October 8, 2020). [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 2:00 am
FIU College of Law– Hannibal Travis, Professor of Law, FIU College of Law, presents today, The United States v. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm
In Shelby County v. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm
” The third category of the statute thus prefers people who are 65 or older, giving them an entitlement to early voting by mail that younger persons do not enjoy unless they satisfy additional criteria.Plaintiffs challenged this law as violative of the Twenty-Sixth Amendment of the Constitution, which provides—also quite straightforwardly—that “[t]he right of citizens of the United States, who are eighteen years of age or older, to vote shall not be denied… [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm
In Part One of this series, I explained why last week’s opinions in Chiafalo v. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm
Washington and Colorado Department of State v. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm
As the Court put it four years ago in Fisher v. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 9:00 pm
§ 541, which provides in blanket terms that “[e]ach United States attorney is subject to removal by the President. [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 4:10 pm
United States Bloomberg had a piece “Fox News Denies Defaming Playboy Model Who Claims Trump Affair”. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 2:12 pm
This principle, first announced by the Supreme Court in 1943's SEC v. [read post]
29 May 2020, 9:04 am
That’s not the law, as the PragerU v. [read post]
20 May 2020, 9:01 pm
In New Energy Company Co. v. [read post]
