Search for: "United States v. Hatch"
Results 1 - 20
of 462
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2012, 2:30 am
The United States Merit Systems Protection Board [Board] determined that Molina-Crespo violated the federal Hatch Act [5 U.S.C. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 12:15 pm
The United States Merit Systems Protection Board [Board] determined that Molina-Crespo violated the federal Hatch Act [5 U.S.C. [read post]
7 May 2015, 3:29 am
The CAFC case Takeda v. [read post]
16 Sep 2007, 2:19 pm
Hatch argues, among other points, that a decision of the United States Supreme Court, Reno v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 2:48 am
First in a Series: Guest Post by Meghan McLoughlin, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law, class of 2014 Brief on the merits of the Amici Curiae United States Senators Orrin G. [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 5:00 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Dec 2019, 5:14 am
United States (No. 18-1059), coined the Bridgegate case. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 5:00 am
Although the federal Hatch Act generally prohibits state and local employeesserving with state or local government entity whose principal employment is in connection with an activity which is financed in whole or in part by loans or grants made by the United States or a Federal agency, from being partisan candidates for elected office, Section 1502(a)(3) of the Act carves out a number of exceptions. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 5:00 am
Although the federal Hatch Act generally prohibits state and local employeesserving with state or local government entity whose principal employment is in connection with an activity which is financed in whole or in part by loans or grants made by the United States or a Federal agency, from being partisan candidates for elected office, Section 1502(a)(3) of the Act carves out a number of exceptions. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 6:25 am
United States, 51 F.4th 1289, 1293 (11th Cir. 2022))). [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 5:01 am
Additional follow-on litigation to Johnson has involved questions about other aspects of ACCA’s “violent felony” definition, as in next term’s United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 9:22 am
Here is today’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
17 May 2023, 8:53 am
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey recently ordered that two separate, but related, Hatch-Waxman cases must be tried together. [read post]
17 May 2023, 8:53 am
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey recently ordered that two separate, but related, Hatch-Waxman cases must be tried together. [read post]
17 May 2023, 8:53 am
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey recently ordered that two separate, but related, Hatch-Waxman cases must be tried together. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 1:35 am
Proveris Scientific Corp. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 5:14 am
In 1947 in the case United Public Workers of America v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 6:08 am
On June 17, 2013, the United States Supreme Court announced a rule that blurs the lines between antitrust and patent law in the context of Hatch-Waxman litigation. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 10:08 am
By Bradley Graveline and Jennifer Driscoll-Chippendale On June 17, 2013, the United States Supreme Court announced a rule that blurs the lines between antitrust and patent law in the context of Hatch-Waxman litigation. [read post]
4 Aug 2006, 1:53 pm
On Monday, the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota struck down the Minnesota Restricted Video Games Act. [read post]
