Search for: "United States v. Hayes" Results 221 - 240 of 426
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Nov 2020, 6:06 pm by Edward Foley
  Many of these are drawn from research for the book Ballot Battles: The History of Disputed Elections in the United States as well as work done for the American Law Institute’s Principles of Law—Election Administration project. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 10:11 pm
Apparently, "romanettes":Monday's Supreme Court oral argument in United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 12:14 pm by PaulKostro
In adopting the Shield Law, New Jersey’s Legislature accepted an invitation by the United States Supreme Court in Branzburg v. [read post]
19 Nov 2011, 11:34 am by Russell Beck
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a decision relating to the intersection between trade secret law and patent law: Atlantic Research Marketing Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 3:47 am by Amy Howe
” At Corporate Counsel, Scott Gant and Christopher Hayes analyze last month’s decision in Dart Cherokee Basin Operating Co. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:13 am by Marty Lederman
  Thankfully, no Justice wrote to give any credence at all to the absurd arguments that the President isn’t an “officer of the United States” or that the presidency isn’t an office “under the United States. [read post]
15 Nov 2012, 5:30 am by Tina Gheen
Today, we return to the United States to discuss the unusual case of Nickerson v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
  By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 8:49 am by Gideon
Hayes, 127 Conn. 543, 581, 18 A.2d 895 [(1941), superseded by statute on other grounds as stated in State v. [read post]