Search for: "United States v. Hayes" Results 221 - 240 of 426
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2012, 7:07 am by Susan Brenner
  As Wikipedia explains, in “the United States federal courts, magistrate judges are appointed to assist United States district court judges in the performance of their duties. [read post]
16 May 2012, 4:25 am by Heidi Henson
The NLRB lacked a quorum of board members when it published its rule amending its representation election procedures on December 16, 2011, and the challenged rule is therefore invalid, the District of Columbia federal district court held, in a perhaps tepid — and temporary — victory for opponents of what has been dubbed the board’s “quickie” or “ambush” election rule (Chamber of Commerce of the United States v NLRB, May 14, 2012,… [read post]
14 May 2012, 3:08 pm by Mark Theodore
 The ambush election rules were challenged by the United States Chamber of Commerce and the Coalition for a Democratic Workplace. [read post]
14 May 2012, 2:07 pm by Justin Keith
In a decision issued a few minutes ago, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia struck down the NLRB’s new election rules because the Board lacked a quorum when it attempted to adopt the final rule. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 11:13 am by Kevin O'Keefe
Hayes), the vast majority of states have shield laws similar to Oregon’s. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 6:53 am by Brennan W. Bolt
Flynn, and Sharon Block occurred while the United States Senate was in session and were made without seeking the advice and consent of the Senate, in violation of Article II, Section 2, Clause 2 of the Constitution. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 7:44 am by Yvonne Daly
Damache v DPP [2012] IESC 11 centred on the constitutionality of s.29(1) of the Offences Against the State Act 1939, as amended by s.5 of the Criminal Law Act 1976. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 6:29 pm by Zachary Spilman
Hayes, No. 12-0900/AF (not to be confused with United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 2:13 pm by Dwight Sullivan
CAAF has issued its opinion in United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 8:11 am by John Lewis
” The decision, which will have a far-reaching impact on all employers, also concluded that recent United States Supreme Court rulings on the Federal Arbitration Act and class arbitration were not implicated. [read post]