Search for: "United States v. Healy" Results 1 - 20 of 74
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am by John Mikhail
Justice Scalia was exactly right about this—and for that matter, so was Chief Justice Marshall, who clarified this very point in his circuit opinion in United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 4:09 pm by Sean Wajert
Oklahoma, 441 U.S. 322, 325–326, 99 S.Ct. 1727, 60 L.Ed.2d 250 (1979); Healy v. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 9:01 pm by Scott Harshbarger and Dennis Aftergut
Mayes’ predecessor, Republican Mark Brnovich, was the lead petitioner in Brnovich v. [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 9:19 am by Dawn Mertineit and Katherine Perrelli
Even though Massachusetts is the 49th state to adopt the UTSA, MUTSA differs from other states’ versions of the UTSA. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 5:23 am by Eugene Volokh
New York State Liquor Authority[15] involved a New York law under which liquor distillers could not sell to wholesalers in New York except in accordance with a monthly price schedule that affirmed that prices in New York were no higher than the lowest prices charged in other states.[16] Healy v. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 12:04 pm by Zak Gowen
”[16] Of course, it is hard to imagine that any drug sold in the United States does not enter the stream of California commerce. [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 1:36 pm by Katherine Pompilio
Jason Healy explained why civil-military relations in the United States must adapt to new demands or cyberspace may be irretrievably diminished. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 2:56 am by INFORRM
McKechnie, United States Air Force Academy Next Week in the Courts We are not aware of any media law cases listed for this week. [read post]
8 Aug 2020, 4:23 am by Schachtman
Some of the relevant publications were Safety Review, starting in 1944, United States Navy Medicine, The Naval Medical Bulletin, and United States Navy Medical News Letter. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 4:11 am by James Romoser
At the Second Thoughts Blog from the Duke Center for Firearms Law, Daniel Rice examines the court’s “void for vagueness” doctrine and how it might relate to the Second Amendment, drawing on Justice Clarence Thomas’ concurrence in United States v. [read post]