Search for: "United States v. Henry" Results 441 - 460 of 1,124
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2017, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
The Henri Van Breda case (Van Breda v Media 24 Limited and Others [2017] ZASCA 97) has confirmed that cameras in courts are not only here to stay, but that this is mandated by the South African Constitution in order to facilitate open justice and the right of the public to hear and see what goes on in our courts. [read post]
17 Jun 2017, 5:54 pm by Bill Otis
 He was both an Assistant US Attorney and then United States Attorney, followed by 17 years of service as a US District Judge for the Eastern District of California. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 1:26 pm
In the United States, shareholder primacy continues to define the legal standard.[15] “While many deplored the disconnect between corporate power and social need, and CSR . . . became a more frequent discussion topic in corporate and academic circles, not many corporations acted meaningfully in pursuing CSR. [read post]
16 Apr 2017, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
Calvin Johnson For the Symposium on Michael Klarman, The Framers' Coup: The Making of the United States Constitution.Michael Klarman’s The Framers’ Coup: The Making of the United States Constitution (Oxford 2016) is an opponent’s history of the adoption of the American Constitution. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 8:12 am by Ronald Collins
After graduating from Harvard Law School, Dorsen spent five years as an assistant United States attorney in the Southern District of New York in the criminal division under Robert M. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 7:21 am by Liisa Speaker
Henry v Detroit, 234 Mich App 405, 410; 594 NW2d 107 (1999). [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: At Bloomberg BNA, John Henry Stam reports on last week’s oral argument in Murr v. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 3:30 am by Henry Chambers
Henry Chambers In Confusion on the Court, Professor Michael Harper discusses how in two recent cases the United States Supreme Court appeared to confuse two critically important concepts in employment discrimination law: disparate treatment (intentional discrimination) and disparate impact (unintentional discrimination). [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 3:03 am by Scott Bomboy
The proposed amendment repealed the 23rd Amendment and gave the federal District two United States Senators and a representative in the House. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 2:25 pm by Jon Sands
  The government therefore failed to show that he intended to remain in the United States. [read post]