Search for: "United States v. Henry" Results 541 - 560 of 1,124
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2010, 12:09 pm by Gerard Magliocca
United States, which assessed the validity of suspending the gold clauses in federal bonds. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 2:01 pm by Kenan Farrell
., operates a hosiery website, worldofleggings.com, which boasts “5.5 million visitors, 27 million views, and millions of dollars in sales across the United States. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 11:47 am by michael
Calrton, 512 U.S. 26 (1994) and United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 10:06 am
He was not captured outside the United States, he is not being held at Guantanamo Bay or elsewhere outside the United States, he has not been afforded a CSRT, he has not been 'determined by the United States to have been properly detained as an enemy combatant,' and he is not 'awaiting such determination.' The MCA was not intended to, and does not, apply to aliens like al-Marri, who have legally entered, and are seized while… [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 8:12 am by Margaret Sachs
Why not allow these investors to sue in United States courts? [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 9:05 am by Stephen Wermiel
United States (2012),  to decisions about the safety of medical devices, Riegel v. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 8:56 am
(collectively, “Apotex”) appeal the decision of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida finding that: (1) Apotex’s U.S. [read post]
19 Jan 2008, 11:58 am
Young Moon, appeals from her conviction and sentence entered by the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee on April 25, 2006, for three counts of health care fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 1:02 pm by WIMS
" There were no cosponsors to the bill which was referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce, Chaired by Representative Henry Waxman (D-CA).On April 2, 2007, the United States Supreme Court, in Massachusetts v. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 12:46 pm by Margaret Wood
”  In 2000, the Supreme Court of the United States in its decision in Troxel v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 3:01 am by Albéniz Couret Fuentes
White asserted that “while in an international sense Porto [sic] Rico was not a foreign country, since it was owned by the United States, it was foreign in a domestic sense, because the island had not been incorporated into the United States, but was merely appurtenant thereto as a possession. [read post]