Search for: "United States v. Hernandez"
Results 421 - 440
of 668
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Nov 2012, 4:06 am
The Florida Supreme Court held in Hernandez v. [read post]
18 Nov 2012, 7:00 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2012, 4:00 am
A different district court followed suit and stated that Section 106 should be read literally to create an independent, exclusive right “to authorize” use of a copyrighted work.14 That court held that “mere authorization . . . constitutes direct infringement and is actionable under United States Copyright Law. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 8:20 am
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., the Court considered whether copyrighted works made and purchased abroad can be bought and sold within the United States without the copyright owner’s permission. [read post]
27 Oct 2012, 5:55 am
United States, No.11-00820, to consider the question of whether Padilla v. [read post]
22 Sep 2012, 2:49 pm
Hernandez, No. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 1:36 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 9:47 am
Recently, in Miller v. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 9:39 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 7:52 pm
We point out, inter alia, that extraterritorial application of the ATS in most cases violates the Court’s longstanding proscription (first enunciated in 1897 in Underhill v Hernandez) against allowing U.S. courts to “sit in judgment on the acts of the government of another, done within its own territory. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 6:41 am
The United States Code contains dozens of criminal conspiracy statutes. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 6:22 am
The motion stated that the minor children sought to appear in this action through Alex Hernandez as Next Friend. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 5:00 am
United States Surgical Corp. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 5:15 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 6:50 am
This doctrine holds,in the broadest outline, that English (like U.S.) courts 'will not sit in judgment on the acts of the government of another done within its own territory' (Underhill v Hernandez, 168 U.S. 250, 252 (1897)) or 'will not adjudicate upon the transactions of foreign sovereign states' (Buttes Gas Oil Co v Hammer (No 3) [1982] AC 888, 931G). [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 11:29 am
Elias was hit with the slew of counts in violation of Title 18 of the United States Code, including: • Conspiracy to commit bank fraud • Substantive bank fraud (16 counts) • Aggravated identity theft (3 counts) • Destruction of evidence (one count) The other 13 defendants were also hit with a variety of counts, depending on the nature of their complicity and responsibility. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 8:06 am
Ferrer, United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, John V. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 6:30 am
In U.S. v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 4:50 am
United States v. [read post]
28 May 2012, 10:09 am
The case is United States v. [read post]
