Search for: "United States v. Hernandez"
Results 601 - 620
of 671
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Aug 2008, 2:56 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 1:50 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: The end of William Patry’s blog: (Patry Copyright Blog), (Excess Copyright), (Patently-O), (Chicago IP Litigation Blog), (Michael Geist), (The Fire of Genius), (Techdirt), (Patry Copyright Blog), Kitchin J clarifies scope of biotech patents, in particular gene sequence patents: Eli Lilly & Co v Human Genome Sciences:… [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 4:43 pm
See United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 1:00 pm
When the United States Supreme Court addressed this problem with regard to claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 4:08 am
See United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 6:24 am
When the United States Supreme Court addressed this problem with regard to claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. [read post]
5 May 2008, 9:24 am
In UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 4:30 am
EVIDENCEUnited States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 6:13 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 8:40 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 4:21 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 9:00 pm
Once a person becomes a Supreme Court justice, no concern should exist about being pleasing enough to senators and the president to get onto a higher court (and getting elevated to a higher court or retained on the existing court, when it comes to some state courts, should not be a concern with any judge on any court); this is the highest court the United States ever has had. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 9:47 pm
United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 7:51 am
Arnold District Court Decision: Recoiling Against Romm In United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 1:18 pm
United States and Carabell v. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 12:20 pm
United States, No. 07-955, the sub-jurisdictional case we previously discussed here, here, and here; and 2) Hernandez v. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
"[A]ll such proceedings for the enforcement, or to restrain violations, of this chapter shall be by and in the name of the United States. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 12:05 pm
It appeared in Colored Men and Hombres Aqui, Hernandez v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
Bureau of Prisons, No. 06-9130 I"n a case involving the scope of 28 U.S.C. section 2680, which carves out certain exceptions to the United States' waiver of sovereign immunity for torts committed by federal employees, the Court rules that section 2680's broad phrase "any other law enforcement officer" covers all law enforcement officers, and not just law enforcement officers enforcing customs or excise laws. [read post]
7 Jan 2008, 1:06 am
United States Subscription Required [read post]
