Search for: "United States v. Hibbs"
Results 1 - 20
of 30
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Nov 2010, 2:48 pm
When the United States Supreme Court ruled in Nevada Department of Human Resources v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 6:43 am
In a case illustrating how a minority position can shift into a majority holding, the Supreme Court of the United States held in Coleman v. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 9:30 pm
In United States v. [read post]
26 May 2022, 4:20 am
Our brief shows how the canonical equal protection cases United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 11:48 am
Florida Growhouse Conviction Overturned Florida Grow House Defense Attorney Lawyer just recieved a report from a colleague about a ruling in a federal growhouse case, United States V. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 11:48 am
Florida Growhouse Conviction Overturned Florida Grow House Defense Attorney Lawyer just recieved a report from a colleague about a ruling in a federal growhouse case, United States V. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
In 2013, in United States v. [read post]
19 May 2007, 9:09 am
United States v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 12:10 pm
Our brief shows how the canonical equal protection cases United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 5:48 am
Hibbs, 538 U.S. 721 (2003). [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 1:36 pm
For example, she cites my article on United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2006, 2:24 pm
Raich, United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2022, 8:30 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 5:00 am
Lopez (1995) United States v. [read post]
30 Mar 2013, 1:12 pm
Hibbs (2003), the Court held that state employees could sue to enforce the family-care (sick relative) provision of the Act. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 2:08 pm
See Hibbs v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 10:04 pm
By Mike Dorf In my latest FindLaw column, I explain why Monday's Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 8:43 am
United States (2005) - felon firearm possession ban doesn't cover foreign convictions Tennessee v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 12:32 pm
Roberts would also represent a number of states in the Microsoft antitrust case, United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 10:41 am
Hibbs, 538 U.S. 721, 727, 123 S.Ct. 1972, 155 L.Ed.2d 953 (2003) (noting that, while Congress may abrogate the States’ sovereign immunity under Section 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment, it may not do so “pursuant to its Article I power over commerce”) (citing Fitzpatrick v. [read post]
