Search for: "United States v. Hinckley" Results 1 - 20 of 21
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2014, 11:14 pm
“[I]n such case it is the law of [the state where the mortal blow is given] that is violated, and not the law of the state where death may happen to occur” (Stout v. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 10:49 am by Terry Lenamon
  This is not true; an individual suffering from a mental illness can be sentenced to death in the United States. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 3:56 am by Russ Bensing
SCOTUS has come down with its first opinion of the term, holding in United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:26 pm by Orin Kerr
Hinckley, 550 F.3d 926, 940 (10th Cir. 2008); United States v. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 3:35 am
The Supreme Court approved that practice in United States v. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 1:18 pm by Amy Howe
The importance of this rule, he suggests, can be seen in the fact that, until 1979, every jurisdiction in the United States allowed an insanity defense. [read post]
9 Aug 2014, 4:16 am by SHG
For a similar case, see United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2022, 4:46 pm by Thomas B. Griffith
But because such states are unlikely to pay, Congress passed the Justice for United States Victims of State Sponsored Terrorism Act (the “Act”), which established a fund to compensate terrorism victims. [read post]